|
|
|
Snap Shots: by Harry Flashman
|
|
Contre Jour - another
French connection?
It is quite a while since I mentioned Contre Jour, but it is such an important
factor in photography that it is important to learn how to handle it.
Now to explain why this technique is in French - simply, the French were first
into photography, so I suppose they are entitled to give us photographic terms
such as ‘Contre Jour’ (literally ‘against the light’).
However, most photographers (French included) seem to be a little in awe of
Contre Jour photography, and stick to the old maxim of having the light source
(generally the sun) coming from behind the photographer. If you do this, you
will be assured of a reasonable, but ordinary photograph, which will record your
friend at the beach, and otherwise be totally unmemorable.
No, if you want something a little better, it is time for ‘Contre Jour’. The
only difficulty with back-lighting, which is the other (English) name for
‘Contre Jour’, is in getting the correct exposure. For example, a girl on the
beach photograph, when you take a full-length shot, the person takes up around
15 percent of the image in the viewfinder. So 85 percent of the shot is not
really wanted, but from the camera’s point of view, that 85 percent will
predominate in the exposure meter’s electronic brain.
Now I know that better cameras have ‘center-weighting’ etc., etc., etc., but
unless you have ‘spot’ metering, the overall exposure decided by the camera will
be an average of the bright back light and the shadowed subject in the front.
This will give you a dark subject, or even so far as a silhouette, in front of a
well exposed background (in this case, the beach).
With today’s automatic exposure cameras you must understand that it doesn’t know
what it is that you are photographing. All the camera’s brain can see is a
mixture of bright lights and dark areas and it will give you an exposure to try
and equalize these out. Unfortunately, in conditions of high contrast in the
tropical sun, or back lit, the camera reaches its limitations and the end result
will be underexposure of the part of the photograph you want. It’s not the
camera’s fault - it just means you have to get smarter.
There are a few ways you can demonstrate your ‘smarts’, and the simplest is by
selective metering. You want the subject to be correctly exposed, so walk in
close to the subject, so the person fills the frame, and note the exposure
values. Now go to the manual mode in the camera, set the aperture and shutter
speed as per the noted values, then walk back and compose the shot. The subject
person will be correctly exposed against a bright background. Great shot!
Another one of these methods is by Fill-in flash. Fortunately, these days many
compacts and SLR’s do have the Fill-in flash mode built in, but many of you do
not use it - or even realize that you have this facility! If you have it - then
use it.
Now, for those of you who have the whole kit and caboodle - an SLR with an
off-camera flash, this section is for you. The whole secret of fill-in flash
revolves around flash synchronization speed. Some of the very latest, and
expensive cameras will synchronize flash and shutter speed all the way through
to 1/2000th of a second or better, but the average SLR will probably say that
the synch speed is 1/125th or even only 1/60th and it is this figure which
drives the exposure setting.
Take note of the exposure settings from the position from which you are going to
take the photograph. Now set the off-camera flash to around the f-stop indicated
by the camera’s exposure meter. In other words, if the camera is going to use
f5.6, then try two shots - one with the flash on f4 and the other on f5.6.
Flashes are notoriously unreliable as to their exact setting, but by taking the
two shots, one will be OK, and the other will be perfect. A correctly exposed
subject against a correctly exposed background.
Brush up on your French and try ‘Contre Jour’ this weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|