Money matters:
Graham Macdonald MBMG International Ltd.
UK Inheritance Tax Part 2
Example of IHT Planning |
A settlor creates a Discounted Gift Trust
for GBP500,000 at 65, and takes a series of interests at 5% per annum.
They die after eight years and the capital remains in trust for their
son who then passes away in year 12. Assuming the fund is worth
GBP640,000 at this time and the beneficiary’s other assets exceed the
NRB, the total IHT would be as follows: |
Old Regulations - IHT on initial transfer and
during trust period = Nil
- On death of the of the Beneficiary:GBP640,000 x 40% = GBP256,000 |
New Regulations Assumes NRB increases by 2.5% per annum and
the value at 10 years =GBP610,000. Therefore:IHT
on initial transfer = Nil as the discountedvalue of the transfer is
below the NRB
Ten Year Charge = GBP14,712 Exit Charge
assuming trust wound up on the death of the son = GBP2,848 |
So, under the new regulations the total
IHT bill for the family is reduced by GBP238,440 |
With the new regulations it is vital for people to understand
that when a beneficiary passes away the trust fund will no longer form part of
an estate for IHT. This means that some people will be actually better off.
Despite this, there will be people who wish to avoid the new rules. This may be
because:
- they wish to invest a lot more that the NRB and do not want to receive a 20%
entry charge
- they do not want, for whatever reason, periodic and exit charges
- the most important things are reduction in taxes with access thereby showing
that flexibility over beneficiaries is not the most important thing
- they want to keep things easily understandable
If any of the above applies then the way to go could well be the bare trust
versions of the main plans. The main advantages are:
- No chargeable transfer
- No requirement to complete IHT100
- No periodic/exit charges
- Will not affect taxation of any flexible trusts that have been created
- Simplicity
- Chargeable events on a beneficiary who is over 18 years old
The main disadvantage of all this is that when you have chosen who the
beneficiaries are then you cannot change them at any time in the future.
However, it has to be said that most people do not mind this. The plans can
prevent beneficiaries winding up the policies and thereby stopping what the
settlors' want whilst they are still alive.
So, it can be seen that it is better to do something than do nothing and the
main benefits of insured schemes, i.e. estate reduction with access to capital,
are still available. Also, clients have options. They can either have
flexibility over beneficiaries and pay some tax or no flexibility and
potentially pay no tax.
Without doubt, the planning of IHT has got a lot more complicated. It requires
advice for qualified advisors with a complete understanding of a client's
gifting history, requirements and how it will impact any future planning.
More than anything, the most important thing to do is to write a Last Will &
Testament (LWT). The new Finance Act 2006 could have serious implications for
those who ignore the possible implications of the new regulations.
Some LWTs will need only a few changes, many will require no changes at all.
However, there will be plenty that need massive re-planning. This especially
applies to expats. So, how have things changed? The basics of it all is that, in
future, most trusts - whether made by LWT or a lifetime transfer into a trust -
will now be subject to the same IHT rules that have applied to discretionary
trusts for years.
There is now the potential for a charge to inheritance tax when:
- the trust is created
- every ten years of its lifetime
- when the assets leave the trust
The whole point of this was to plug the loopholes and prevent any legitimate and
legal tax avoidance. It is a must that LWTs need to be reviewed if they contain
gifts to children or create what are known as Interest in Possession trusts
where there is an income beneficiary. It must be emphasized though that the
changes will not affect the actual provisions of the LWT, only the way they are
taxed. So, the only real difference is that the heirs could receive a
substantially smaller amount than had been originally intended because it has
fallen within the reach of HMRC.
To be continued…
The above data and research was compiled from sources
believed to be reliable. However, neither MBMG International Ltd nor its
officers can accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the above
article nor bear any responsibility for any losses achieved as a result of any
actions taken or not taken as a consequence of reading the above article. For
more information please contact Graham Macdonald on
[email protected]@mbmg-international.com
|
Snap Shots: by Harry Flashman
Learning to
master ‘manual’
Photography
is still, despite the digital revolution, all about handling the
variables involved in producing an image. And by handling all
the variables yourself, you have total control over how that
image turns out. And that entails mastering the M or Manual
mode.
Now there are people who say that this is not necessary. Today’s
cameras are smarter than we are, etc etc etc. You can twirl a
knob, or select from a pull-down menu, the “portrait” mode or
the “action” mode, and let the camera do the rest. That is all
very fine, but you will get the portrait, or the action, that
the camera ‘thinks’ is right. Not what you necessarily want, and
there’s a big difference.
Improving your photography is not really all that difficult, and
you don’t even need to go to school. There are many world class
famous photographers who never had a lesson in their lives. But
they did read, and they did experiment, and they did learn from
their own work.
There are really only two main variables, and after you
understand them and what they do to your photograph it becomes
very simple.
The first thing to remember is that the correct exposure is
merely a function of how large is the opening of the lens and
how much time the shutter is left open to let the light strike
the film. That’s almost it - that is photography in a nutshell.
No gimmicks or fancy numbers - a straight out relationship - how
open and for how long - this is known as the “Exposure”.
Now I will presume, for the sake of this exercise that you have
an SLR and use it in the automatic, or “Programme” mode. Let’s
go straight to the “mode” menu and look up “A” or “Aperture
Priority”. In this mode it means that you can choose the
aperture yourself, and the camera will work out the shutter
speed that corresponds to the correct exposure. Simple.
So let’s play with this facility to give you some better
pictures. Select “A” and then look at the lens barrel and you
will see the Aperture numbers, generally between 2.8 and 22. To
give you a subject with sharp focus in the foreground and a
gently blurred background, you need to select an aperture around
f2.8 to f4. Hey! It was that simple. To get those “professional”
portrait shots, with the model’s face clear and the background
all wishy washy, just use the A mode and select an Aperture
around f4 to f 2.8.
Now, if on the other hand you want everything to be nice and
sharp, all the way from the front to the back, like in a
landscape picture, then again select A and set the lens barrel
aperture on f16 to f22. The camera will again do the rest for
you. Again - it’s that easy!
Flushed with creative success, let’s carry on. The next mode to
try is the “S” setting. In this one, you set the shutter speed
and the camera automatically selects the correct aperture to
suit. Take a look at the shutter speed dial or indicator and you
will see a series of numbers that represent fractions of a
second.
First, let’s “stop the action” by using a fast shutter speed.
For most action shots, select S and set the shutter speed on
around 1/500th to 1/1000th and you will get a shot where you
have stopped the runner in mid stride, or the car half way
through the corner or the person bungee jumping. Yes, it’s that
easy.
So this week you have learned that to get a good portrait shot
use the A mode and set the aperture on f4 to f2.8 and forget
about the rest of the technical stuff. Just compose a nice
photograph and go from there. (Do remember to walk in close
however!) To get a great landscape shot, again use the A mode
and set the aperture at f16 to f22.
Finally, to stop the action, choose the S mode and around
1/500th of a second and you won’t get blurry action shots ever
again.
Certainly there are other aspects to good photography, but
master the A and S modes and you will produce better pictures.
Modern Medicine:
by Dr. Iain Corness, Consultant
Keeping in contact
A good friend rang me to ask where he could go to get measured for contact
lenses. After discussing this a little further it turned out that he used to
wear the ‘hard’ style contact lens many years ago, but was not conversant
with the newer style of soft, permeable lenses.
However, it isn’t just a case of bunging some in and forget about it. Quite
the reverse. With all our organs that can go wrong, go wrong, go wrong, did
you know that eye problems are some of the commonest reasons for a doctor
visit? And for those of you who wear contact lenses (like me) there are even
more eye problems for us to get, despite the common use of contact lenses
these days.
What has to be remembered is the fact that a contact lens is a foreign body
in the eye. The “skill” in manufacturing the contact lens is in making it so
smooth that the eyeball doesn’t really realise there is a foreign body there
at all.
There are various types of contact lens, the old hard ones were made of a
material called polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) which is rigid and doesn’t let
oxygen through, but the newer ones have a material called siloxane which is
gas permeable. These hard lenses are the most trouble free, although the
most difficult to look after. Sounds topsy-turvy, I know.
The second type of lens is the soft contact lens, of which there is a
“permanent” style and a disposable type. These are made of
hydroxymethylmethacrylate (HEMA) which contains between 30-60 percent water
and are gas permeable. However, soft disposable lenses give the most
problems, but are the easiest to look after, in direct contrast with the
hard lenses. Again sounds weird, I know.
The commonest problems with all contact lenses is infection, and since the
lens is a foreign body, there is a good reason to get an infection
immediately. For those of you who leave your lenses in overnight, you have
an increased risk of infection by a factor of 10. Take them out every night,
you have been warned!
Infection is not to be thought of as something that just happens and when it
does you just pop in a few eye drops and get better automatically. Bacterial
infection can be sight threatening and the cornea (the clear bit in the
centre that you look through) can be destroyed in 24 to 48 hours. There is
also a parasite that can get into the eye of contact lens users who have
rinsed their lens with contaminated water, or who have worn their lenses
swimming in contaminated water.
One very common problem is “losing” the lens in the eye, both the hard and
soft types. The most important thing to remember is not to panic. The lens
cannot go “behind” the eye. It just rolls itself up under the lid. Try to
avoid rubbing and it will reappear in an hour or so.
The other very common problem is eye irritation. This is caused by material
under the lens or damage to the lens itself, such as splitting or tearing.
If you take out the lens and you find it breaking up, do not put it back in
- you run the risk of damaging the cornea. If you are like me and you wear
your “two week” contacts until they fall apart - remember you are running a
risk!
Lens care is the most important feature and you should always wash your
hands before removal or insertion. The lens container should be scrupulously
clean and the storage/cleaning fluid should be fresh, and never use water.
Look after your lenses, take them out at night, change them frequently and
remove them immediately if there is any irritation or redness. “See” you
next week!
Heart to Heart with Hillary
Dear Hillary,
I was very interested to read your advice to Valentino last week and
wondered if perhaps you could help me too. I have a British motorcycle (a
Triumph) and I park it in the garage when I go off shore. I have noticed
that when I come back these days, it no longer leaks oil on the garage
floor. I have my suspicions that my wife has given it to a Thai boyfriend,
and the motorcycle is staying at his place while I’m away. Why she would do
this is beyond me as I give her everything she wants, gold chains and
everything. I really cannot think of any other reason for the garage floor
to be so clean. Do you think the seals have taken up, or what is happening?
Is there another logical answer?
Ken
Dear Ken,
Just what have I brought on my head this time? Now it’s a motorcycle clinic!
No, my Petal, the seals on your Triumph have not taken up. Good British
bikes always leak oil, so there is a simple answer for you. Have you checked
the level of oil in the crankcase? For a logical answer, I think you will
find there is no oil left. That is the only feasible explanation with your
British bike. Unless it was made in Japan, whereupon it is really a copy
bike! Check the serial numbers, Poppet. And talk to the nice man at the
motorcycle shop, not Hillary. You could of course, try locking it up while
you are away. A good heavy chain, like the gold one your wife wears, with a
strong combination lock, should be enough to keep it in the garage, and you
will see if the drip is from the motorcycle, or perhaps it is you.
Dear Hillary,
A rum drinky for you. “Red Smarties yum, yum, red Barons no good,” says Nit.
Mistersingha
Dear Mistersingha,
Your cryptic note arrived at the office attached to a bottle of Bacardi
Orange Breezer and a triple pack of Smarties. I almost fainted when the
messenger brought it up stairs! I thought you were dead (or perhaps it was
only wishful thinking on my part). I immediately checked the expiry dates,
and none of it was old stock you had got cheaply. The tax label was still
attached to the Breezer, so it hadn’t been tampered with either! It
certainly isn’t French champagne and Belgian chocolates, but it’s a start,
Mistersingha, it’s a start. How the Red Baron Manfred von Richthofen got
involved with your Smarties, I do not know, or understand from your note.
But then again, there is lots that I do not understand about you. As is
often said in this country, “The more you know, the less you understand!”
(For anyone new to this column, this chap has been promising me all sorts of
goodies for the past few years, none of which ever materialize.)
Deer I’ll,
This is briefly speekin, yer Nairod wiv Ingerlish elp from me mucker Dorian.
Whilst sojourning in one temporary residence (scrubland off Naklua) one was
idly perusing a discarded, ketchup stained copy of one’s favourite journal
when one’s attention was drawn to a brief mention of one’s name, legible
through the ketchup as, “that (something) Nairod, which kept one guessing as
to how one was being portrayed to one’s public in the wake of one’s recent
castigation. Did it read, perhaps “that charmer Nairod’s endearing
correspondence is sadly missed,” or “that wonderful Nairod, lonely and
unattached should remain so while leaping off Jomtien tower,” or “that
darling Nairod, my one sweet Romeo whom I offer my troth, even though he’s
not fit to eat from one,” or “that sweet Nairod living rough in the Naklua
region is hopefully getting bitten thereabouts,” or “that poetical Nairod
penned passion will forever light up my column and my sweet replies will
light up his, and vulgarity such as Mr Singha’s be edited to extinction.”
Still guessing.
Nairod
Dear Nairod,
So that you don’t lie awake at night in your rough shelter made from
discarded cigarette packets and bottles of M150, I will let you know what
was printed in the Pattaya Mail (before ketchup). It was my response to
Mistersingha which was, “You’re still alive then! What a shame. Have you
thought of teaming up with the dreadful Nairod creature? You deserve each
other.” So no more guessing. Now it’s the awful truth (and not troth).
As far as offering you my troth, I wouldn’t offer you a trough, though with
your stated standard of accommodation, it would probably fit in with the
rest of the décor.
As you will have seen, the letter above yours this week has come from
Mistersingha, wrapped around some Smarties and a small bottle of Bacardi
Breezer, and that was why I decided to print it, totally against my better
judgment. And having stooped so low, I may as well continue and print yours
as well, even though there were no Smarties, Bacardi Breezer or anything
else edible, though I suppose I should consider myself lucky. It could have
been a ketchup stained back copy of the Pattaya Mail (and don’t even think
about it, Nairod). Fare thee well, sweet Nairod. Fare thee well!
Learn to Live to Learn: with Andrew Watson
Resolution
Well, that was quite a holiday. I mean, it's not like I've been
lying in my hammock for the past eight weeks. Actually, I've
been busy as a bee, so much so that it is with a sense of some
concern that I glance at the calendar and see that January is
already long gone. Nonetheless, it is never too late to wish you
all a happy and successful new year, especially as there's
another one upon us. Indeed, it's a funny thing, but there
always seems to be some or other culture's New Year, around the
next corner. Personally, I pay particular attention to the
Jewish New Year (Rosh Hashanah - it's now the year 5767), the
Western New Year, the Thai New Year, (it's going to be 2550) and
the Chinese New Year, which is always a magnificent celebration,
wherever in the world you happen to be.
The
schools of football have bigger goals.
As a Londoner, I was fortunate that from an early age I was able
to visit Chinatown and throw a few firecrackers with everybody
else. Chinese culture, embodied through its traditions, ritual,
symbols and heroes becomes a fusion of colour, pageantry,
mysticism and noise; a tremendous cultural celebration. As for
the 'West', I watched 'highlights' of some of the firework
displays from around the world. Ever since the Millennium
Olympics in 2000, the Sydney Harbour Bridge, with all its
monumental extravagance, seems to have become an almost iconic
entrée into a New Year. London pushed her close this time.
When I watch these pyrotechnic parties I am struck by three
things. First, they look and sound great. Fireworks are a
tremendous invention; thank you China. Second, I consider how
much they cost; figures are released suggesting that London's
cost over 1 million pounds and Sydney's cost 4 million
Australian dollars. Then thirdly, I think to myself, "Is there
seriously no better use to which this money could have been
put?"
Little people play a part in a bigger
picture.
Defenders of the displays might argue that they are a
manifestation of democracy; a public display for the people, by
the people; "It's what they want, you know" I am told. An
interesting view and it's true, I admit, that there is a
wonderful feeling of egalité, liberté and fraternité created by
an explosion of colour in the sky. However, whether they are
'democratic' in the true sense of the word is less certain and a
different matter. In a city of eight million people, such as
London, I suggest that you could count the percentage points of
people in the city who either actually want to see the fireworks
or get to see the fireworks, on the fingers of one hand. I
should be careful; being critical of firework displays is a
dangerous game; you'll just get labelled a "killjoy", although I
should stress, I'm not against them per se. I just find myself
wondering what the world's priorities are? "Anyway," the
firework fans say, "What else would you do with the money?"
We're all ears; hearts and minds, too.
Now that is a good question. One of the things I have been
'busying' myself with during my sabbatical from "Learn to Live
to Learn" has been a project which by its selfless defence of
the defenceless, has inspired me to do more. It's a charity
called, "The Esther Benjamins Trust" and it's as brave as it is
beautiful. The charity rescues enslaved, trafficked, abused
children from circuses in India and creates safe havens, after
care and education for them in Nepal, from whence the majority
of them have been taken in the first place. Where there is
misery, they bring hope. But why Nepal, you might ask? What's it
got to do with Thailand? What's it got to do with us? What's it
got to do with me?
Welcome to the school of fun.
I'm the first to recognise that there are many worthy causes. As
an aficionado of the International Baccalaureate Organisation,
their mission and their programmes, it has always been my view
that it is a good idea to act and think locally, regionally and
globally. The central CAS (creativity action service) component
of the IB diploma programme encourages students to do just that.
In thinking, planning and acting both within and beyond their
immediate cultural or national identities, it is very difficult
for students not to arrive at an understanding of the increasing
interdependence of people around the world. (It might be easy to
slip into platitudes here, so I'll try my best not to.)
Gabrielle,
the Brazilian.
It could equally be argued that it is not so much a matter of
interdependence between peoples as the continued dependence of
the vulnerable on the powerful, which characterises the reality
of the human condition today. But if we choose to aspire to a
world characterised by interdependence, equality and social
justice, then we must first work to alleviate the condition of
dependence.
In Nepal, where literacy is low and poverty is high, agents of
inhumanity plunder a perfect picking ground. Families are
promised 2 dollars a day - double what most families earn - if
their daughter goes to work in a circus. Rarely, following a
derisory initial payment, does any money ever arrive. In
reality, the children are sold - trafficked - into slavery. They
are usually aged between 6 and 10 years old. Those fortunate few
who have already been rescued tell horrifying tales of sexual,
physical and psychological abuse. If the situation on the ground
is despicable for children, it's also terribly dangerous for the
people who risk their lives to rescue them. One activist
recently suffered a fractured leg and serious head injuries
after being hit by iron rods by circus thugs, whilst government
officials and police looked on. You have to be courageous to
care.
The more I learn about the Esther Benjamins Trust, the more I am
determined to follow their example. Here in Thailand, literally
on the ground, every week, students of all ages are congregating
in the tens (soon to be hundreds) to contribute to the charity.
The St Andrews School of Football (mainly primary students) and
the Garden School of Football (for students aged 8-18) meet
every Saturday morning at their respective schools between 8
a.m. and 10 a.m., where they are coached in conjunction with the
English FA award scheme. The proceeds from their fees are
transferred directly to the Esther Benjamins Trust. In April, we
hope to take a group of IB students to Nepal, to follow through
this 'good work' on the ground. It's an inspiring story, in
which you can play a real part. The next sessions begin on
Saturday March 3rd.
One of my many New Year resolutions was, "Do something real" to
help. The needs of trafficked children after all, are far, far
greater than mine will ever be and perhaps when they are all
rescued, then I'll send fireworks into the night sky.
Andrew Watson is a Management Consultant for Garden
International Schools in Thailand. andreww@gar denrayong.com
All proceeds from this column are donated to the Esther
Benjamins Trust. www.ebtrust.org.uk email: [email protected]
Next week: Implementing the IBO mission statement
|