Money matters:
Graham Macdonald MBMG International Ltd.
It’s enough to turn you green - part 2
The tipping point for melting of the Greenland ice sheet will
probably be met during the next 20 to 50 years. The latest research indicates
that glacier speed has almost doubled in the last decade. Complete melting might
take millennia, but research suggests that once it begins to contract it may not
expand again, even if atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations were reduced
back to pre-industrial levels.
Although debate continues, the growing body of evidence on greenhouse gases
suggests that significant climate change is inevitable. Even if we stopped
producing greenhouse gas emissions immediately, we would still experience rising
temperatures for decades to come and sea temperatures will continue to rise for
many centuries, due to inertia in the climate system.
We might hope that extreme ‘tipping points’, the point beyond which change
cannot be reversed can be avoided. However, evidence so far must lead us to
conclude that some level of change has already occurred and that it will
continue to occur, perhaps at a higher level than previously thought.
How we are experiencing global warming today & what can we expect
in the future?
Polar bears are starving near the Arctic Circle. The U.S. Department of
the Interior has proposed to list the polar bear as “threatened” under the
Endangered Species Act. Polar bears hunt their prey from sea ice, which has been
declining steadily as the climate warms.
Since 1978, the late summer Arctic sea ice area has been shrinking by 7 percent
per decade, while perennial sea ice has dropped by 9.8 percent in that time,
according to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s satellite
measurements.
If shrinking ice caps lead to rising sea levels in excess of four metres, almost
every coastal city in the world would be under water. Even small rises in sea
levels are likely to create severe economic and demographic problems, since
large populations are concentrated near present sea level. Should glaciers
decline rapidly, this could also have a significant negative impact because one
sixth of the earth’s population currently rely on glaciers for their water
supply. For example, rapid melt could have the effect of slowing major rivers,
such as the Rhine, to a trickle.
The harmful effects of global warming on daily life are already showing up, and
within a couple of decades hundreds of millions of people will not have enough
water, according to many top scientists. An acute water crisis is looming.
China, for example, is set to use up to 89 percent of its available water
resources by 2030. Hundreds of millions of Africans and tens of millions of
Latin Americans who now have water will be short of it in less than 20 years. By
2050, more than one billion people in Asia could face water shortages. By 2080,
water shortages could threaten 1.1 billion to 3.2 billion people, depending on
the level of greenhouse gases that cars and industry spew into the air.
At the same time, tens of millions of others will be flooded out of their homes
each year as the Earth reels from rising temperatures and sea levels, according
to a draft of an international scientific report. About 100 million people a
year could be flooded by 2080 by rising seas.
The overriding view from the scientists is that soon global warming will “affect
everyone’s life,” with the poor being particularly affected. Death rates for the
world’s poor from global-warming-related illnesses, like malnutrition and
diarrhoea, will rise by 2030. Malaria and dengue fever, as well as illnesses
from eating contaminated shellfish, are likely to grow. Europe’s small glaciers
will disappear, with many of its large glaciers shrinking dramatically by 2050.
And half of Europe’s plant species could be vulnerable, endangered or extinct by
2100.
Are companies changing their business models
in anticipation of changing consumer behaviour, due to global warming?
“Shopping is politics and consumers can change the world with their wallets,” a
statement coined by U2’s Bono. Whilst this slogan has generally been the
rallying cry in the fight against at AIDS, it is no less relevant when referring
to global warming. The argument is that by opting to buy products that add an
ethical or eco dimension to style, as opposed to products without one, consumers
will drive the behaviour of big brands. It’s simply spending power.
Green is now fashionable, companies are burnishing their environmental
credentials and becoming “carbon neutral” with almost as much passion as they
have for profits.
James and Rupert Murdoch, Sir Richard Branson, Lee Scott of Wal-Mart, Terry
Leahy of Tesco and Jeff Immelt of GE are among the converts.
The surprising thing is the number of US companies that paint themselves green,
despite the Bush administration’s opposition to the Kyoto treaty and the capping
of carbon dioxide emissions. Sir Richard Branson managed to make the Virgin
Group’s investment of $3bn over 10 years in renewable energy, such as biofuels,
sound as much as a virtuous gesture, as that of a smart financial gamble. But so
what? Corporate self-interest can be a force for good.
When “Whole Foods Markets” announced in January this year that it would buy all
of its electricity from wind farms, making itself the corporate world’s largest
consumer of renewable energy, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman called
them “the most patriotic company in America.” That’s the kind of publicity you
can take to the bank.
Indeed, Sustainability Advantage author Willard cites polls that show more than
a fifth of potential job candidates are drawn to such companies. His research
also shows more concrete benefits from the adoption of eco-friendly corporate
policies; reduced manufacturing expenses, increased market share, a better
talent pool and higher productivity. All of this, according to Willard, can lead
to a 66% increase in profit on average for small and medium-sized companies that
adopt environment minded practices.
To be continued…
The above data and research was compiled from sources
believed to be reliable. However, neither MBMG International Ltd nor its
officers can accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the above
article nor bear any responsibility for any losses achieved as a result of any
actions taken or not taken as a consequence of reading the above article. For
more information please contact Graham Macdonald on
[email protected]@mbmg-international.com.com
|
Snap Shots: by Harry Flashman
Frame your best
photographs
I
have included three photographs this week. Two I took myself, and one
was taken by Australian photo-journalist Gary Stubbs. The subject matter
is different in each one – a stupa, a Buddha and Greg Sulis, a well
known Pattaya restaurateur. In theory there should be nothing in common
with these pictures, but there is. It is the “frame within a frame”
technique that has been used to lift the photographs out of the
‘ordinary’ basket.
By including a ‘frame’ in the shot, which frames the subject, adds depth
and sometimes a little mystery to the final shot. With the person shot,
by bringing Greg inside the frame has given the photograph some
dimension. It also has put the subject at ease, leaning on the window
jamb. The end result is a much more pleasing portrait than one of him
standing stiffly in the middle of nowhere with a confusing background.
The
stupa is obviously taken from within another stupa, and you can see
three spires inside the frame. There is good depth to this shot, and you
can feel you are in an area with numbers of these (Ayutthaya). The
observant ones amongst you will also note that there are two figures
walking around the base of the ancient building. This gives a sense of
scale, so you can see that the buildings are quite large.
The third shot shows a different way to draw your attention to a
reclining Buddha. It is always difficult to show a Buddha statue in its
entirety, as many like this one are so large, you have to stand too far
away to get all the Buddha image in. And by that stage you have an army
of Korean tourists descended from their tour bus, standing between you
and the statue. On this shot, you can see the Buddha’s hand behind the
head, the lighting gives form to the subject, and the inclusion of the
decaying brick wall gives an indication of the age of the scene. The
image does not seem ‘cut off’ as the frame within the frame has done it
for you, all very naturally.
Obviously
you should not attempt the frame within a frame technique for every shot
you take, but you should be on the lookout for natural frames to use.
All part of developing the ‘photographic eye’.
Remember that the reason these shots “work” is because they are a
different way of recording a subject, and result in a different and
memorable photograph.
Never forget that for other shots, always look for a different
viewpoint. As well as the ‘standard’ shots, also try to take some shots
not from the non-standard eye-level position. Squat down, lie down,
stand in the back of a pick-up, climb a ladder – anything! Just don’t
get stuck with standard eye-level views.
The other way to add interest to your photographs is to make sure the
subject is one third in from either edge of the viewfinder. Just by
placing your subject off-centre immediately drags your shot out of the
“ordinary” basket. The technocrats call this the “Rule of Thirds”, but
you don’t need to know the name for it – just try putting the subjects
off-centre.
While still on the Rule of Thirds, don’t have the horizon slap bang in
the centre of the picture either. Put it one third from the top or one
third from the bottom. As a rough rule of thumb, if the sky is
interesting put more of it in the picture, but if it is featureless blue
or grey include less of it. Simple!
Modern Medicine:
by Dr. Iain Corness, Consultant
Getting up on the top side of the grass
I bumped into a patient in the lift and said “Good morning.”
He replied, “Any morning you wake up on the top side of the grass is a good
morning.” I thought about it for a while, and had to agree with him. Being
‘alive’ is one of the delights of life. I know that sounds fairly trite, but
it happens to be correct. Being alive always beats the alternative in my
book.
Now I have been accused of being an incurable optimist, with an endless
supply of rose colored glasses, but I have found that it makes life much
more enjoyable. Sure, there’s lots of downers and I’ve had my share, but if
you don’t have some downers, you won’t appreciate the ‘uppers’ half as much.
It takes the same amount of thought and energy to find good points in
anything as it does to find bad points, so why dwell on the dark depressing
ones? Doesn’t make sense to me, to be honest.
In my time as a doctor, I have also been given many lessons by patients,
which have helped mold my ideas on life too, and I shall share one of those
with you today. I was doing a surgical term in Gibraltar and this lady
appeared at Outpatients, complaining of abdominal pains. A hand on the belly
indicated multiple lumps, and my boss, the consultant surgeon, said that
undoubtedly this was wide-spread cancer and we would open her up to confirm
the diagnosis and close her immediately after as there would be no further
treatment as the cancer would have spread too far.
So she came to theatre, and it was just as his experience said it would be.
I shall never forget seeing the multiple cancerous lumps adherent to
everything throughout her abdomen. There really was nothing that could be
done. We closed the wound and sent her back to the ward, to “let nature take
its course”.
Over the next few days the cancer became more aggressive, ulcerating through
the wall of the bowel and through the wall of her abdomen, making a dirty,
smelly wound oozing faeces that could only get worse. The odor was so putrid
we had to put her in a private room to contain the smell. I waited for the
poor woman to die.
There was only one problem, she was quite convinced she would get better and
would be going home for Xmas. “In a wooden box,” I used to think to myself.
Around October, the nurse in charge of the case asked me to come and review
the ulcerated abdominal wound because she said it was getting better. “The
wound is clean and is closing.” Knowing that this could not be the
situation, I grumpily went to see the woman.
I had to overcome my black mood and agree with the nurse, it was getting
better! But this was impossible. All collective medical knowledge and
experience knew this could not happen. This was a terminal situation. But
the exterior wound was closing.
It eventually closed completely and she began to pass faeces normally. The
bowel inside had healed as well. In addition, all the lumps we had
previously felt had melted away. The woman had made a complete recovery, and
went home for Xmas, not in a box, but walking confidently. All the accepted
medical expertise was found to be wanting. Some might even like to call it a
miracle.
Personally I am not into the concept of miracles, but I have been forced to
face the fact that medicine is still a very inexact “science”. There is much
in life and living that we do not fully understand. Every day we understand
a little more, but we are still a long way off understanding “life”.
So, any morning you wake up on the top side of the grass is a good morning.
The gentleman in the lift and the lady in Gibraltar have made sure I
understand it, and hopefully you do too. Enjoy your living, it makes “life”
just so much more fun.
Heart to Heart with Hillary
Dear Hillary,
A couple of weeks ago you told some poor chap who had gone out to Thailand
to see the girl he was pretty sure he was going to marry, that he should
just like it or lump it when the girl in question had gone off with some
other guy to Phuket. You also came up with the sweeping statement that “90
percent of those guys never show up again”. Of course, when you are saying
it’s OK for them to go off with someone else who just happens to be there at
the time, and bad luck for the poor sod who had gone out to see her, no
wonder. You are excusing very poor behavior, my Petal Hillary. I reckon you
owe him better advice than you gave him.
John
Dear John,
You are guilty of quoting me out of context, Petal. You are conveniently
leaving out my statement, “If you’re here for a good time, then go out with
the good-time girls. If you’re looking for your life’s partner then you
don’t begin in a bar.” He was looking in the wrong place, that is what I was
trying to tell him. If you want to buy some cheese, then you don’t find it
in a hardware shop. Can I be any more plain than that? That’s the best
advice he could possible get.
Dear Hillary,
You probably think I’m being silly, but I need your advice on restaurants. I
like to take a girl out to eat, as the evenings are the only time I have to
relax. I don’t want to drag around the place, hoping that the restaurant has
a menu outside for me to see beforehand whether I can afford for two people
to eat there. Many times the girl seems to select expensive places and
orders big and ends up with a doggy bag to take home, which is not what I
want either. I just want some guide, so as I don’t embarrass myself. I
travel a lot throughout Thailand, so any pointers you can give me, the
better.
Dining Out Dave
Dear Dining Out Dave,
I feel sorry for you, my Petal, I really do. I know what it is like with
your nose pressed against the window, trying to read the small print on the
menu taped to the glass to see if you can afford to go inside. You don’t
want to be thought of as Kee Niow (stingy), but at the same time we all have
to watch our baht these days. In Pattaya and Chiang Mai, both the Pattaya
Mail and the Chiangmai Mail have dining out columns which will give you an
indication of how expensive or otherwise the reviewed restaurant is. There
is also a book brought out by Blue Mango Publishing (ISBN
13:978-974-88245-5-0) called Thailand’s Best Restaurants 2007 which covers
many in Bangkok, and a few in other provinces. Like most things in life, you
have to do your homework first, I’m afraid.
By the way, don’t be worried about your request for help, I’ve had much
stranger queries over the years, including repairs for motorcycles.
Dear Hillary,
I have found recently that I have become very attracted to a waitress in our
favorite restaurant. We go there every Friday night and I have begun to look
forward to Friday very much. Maybe I’ve been reading too much into it, but I
am sure she stands closer to me than she needs to, brushes the back of my
arm when she serves me, and is always smiling and very attentive. It is
really giving me much heart-ache. How do I find out if she really does find
me attractive too? Obviously I cannot ask my husband about this, but I need
to know before planning the next move. I should add that I am 40 years of
age (but look younger) and I have never done anything like this before.
Very Tempted
Dear Very Tempted,
A waitress smiles at you every Friday night when she recognizes you as a
regular customer, and here you are “planning the next move.” A “move” that
is nothing like anything you’ve done before. To where? Oh my poor girl!
Don’t you realize that service people are trained to smile and give personal
attention to the guests? That is their job. The good ones will always make
you feel special, but you should not take that beaming smile to mean “How’s
about a quick bit of what’s your fancy behind the salad bar?” You are eager
to experiment I can see, but the place to do this is not in your favorite
restaurant, Petal. Or even in commercial aeroplanes! That’s not heart-ache
you’re experiencing – are you sure your left breast isn’t in the ash tray
while gazing into her eyes? Hillary suggests you look to the alternative
relaxation places, rather than risk embarrassment in an eating place, which
is quite different from a meeting place. However, I do suggest caution. It
may seem that Thailand is a free and easy place, but it is not. And as a
foreigner the road is even more dangerous.
Learn to Live to Learn: with Andrew Watson
Third Culture Kids – the Pioneers
Since Drs John and Ruth Useem fashioned the term,
“third culture” fifty or so years ago, a period of rampant,
unremitting and accelerating socio-economic, educational and
political change has been at hand. Useem (in Pollock and Van
Reken, 1999) recognised that concepts evolve, reflecting a
changing world. In the 21st century world of “disorganised
capitalism” (Lash & Urry, 1987 in Morrison, 1998, p2) dominated
by the “cult of immediacy” (Morrison, 1998, p2) and fuelled by a
global revolution in communications, the Third Culture Kid
(hereafter TCK) is a phenomenon whose defining characteristics
are consistent with that of the pioneer. Simultaneously the
beneficiaries and victims of global nomadism, I propose that
TCKs have full ownership of a culture of their own – that of the
TCK itself and international schools, I suggest, are their
natural habitat.
“A TCK is a person who has spent a significant part of his or
her developmental years outside the parents’ culture. The TCK
builds relationships to all of the cultures, while not having
full ownership in any. Although elements from each culture are
assimilated into the TCKs life experience, the sense of
belonging is in relationship to others of similar background”.
(Pollock, D.C. and Van Reken, R.E. 1999, p19)
When I first encountered the concept of TCKs, their
characteristic traits seemed immediately familiar, for three
reasons. Firstly, I recognised my own children as TCKs.
Secondly, I think of myself as an adult TCK. Thirdly, my
experience of living on a Kibbutz in Israel and being married to
a Kibbutznik, alerted me to the similarities between the Kibbutz
Halutzim (pioneers) and TCKs, to which I will refer.
Pollock, D.C. and Van Reken, R.E. (1999, p34) were among the
first to ask: “What is it about growing up in multiple cultures
and with high mobility that creates such instant recognition of
each other’s experiences and feelings?” Considering answers to
this question is central to understanding the culture of the
TCK. Schaetti (1996) writes of a sense of “Cultural Marginality”
which can have either a positive or negative effect on the TCK.
Either they can feel trapped or “encapsulated”, feeling isolated
and perhaps frozen by their sense of uniqueness. Or they can
experience “Constructive Marginality” where the TCK has
developed a strong sense of personal identity which enables them
to create unambiguous boundaries when confronted with “multiple
cultural perspectives” (Schaetti, 1996).
I think that constructive marginality is a condition which takes
time to evolve, when experience of living in another culture has
taught you how to maintain a sense of intuitive distance, whilst
you feel able to ‘dip’ into a well of understanding of different
cultures as and when appropriate or necessary. It is something
to be aspired to and does not entail what Pearce (1998) calls
“benevolent polyvalence”. Rather, developing a sense of identity
as a TCK might very well involve reflection followed by
reassessment of what national identity means. The TCK is likely
to experience confusion in loyalties and patriotism in
reconciling tolerance and understanding of other cultures with
identity of their first culture.
Schaetti (1996) talks about a “multicultural reality” which in
my family’s case, means having places in different countries to
stay which we call ‘home’ but perhaps, no single place which
feels like home. It has manifested itself in many ways, one of
which I like to call, ‘baggage skills’. We travel across the
world with hand luggage only, knowing that we have appropriate
clothing waiting for us in each ‘home’. We take great ‘TCK’
pride in slipping comfortably into the clothes of the country we
have entered and in so doing, we also feel that we are adopting
the culture and personalities that had been packed away since
our last visit.
For TCKs, long-haul travel and impermanence become a way of life
and adventure becomes the norm, resulting in expanded world
view, increasingly easy acceptance of the sense of transience
and the facilitation of acculturation. The acculturation process
may be continually repeated and “visually represented as a
continuous wave” (Fennes & Hapgood, 1997, in Ezra 2003 p126). I
prefer the analogy of a pebble thrown into a pond, the resulting
ripples having an ever decreasing impact.
Reverse culture shock is an unkind addition to the burdens
carried by the TCK and can be an intensely disappointing
experience. “Woe to the TCK who forgets where he or she is”
(Pollock, D.C. and Van Reken, R.E. 1999, p45). Even spending a
short time back in a first culture previously departed can feel
variously like oppression and regression. Common is the
sensation that ‘nothing has changed back home’. Short term joy
at being back, even for a short period, can quickly become long
term loneliness as a TCK realizes a sense of homelessness. “When
you leave your home culture for a foreign one, you expect things
to be different. When you leave the foreign culture to return
home, you expect things to be the same” (Duane Elmer, 2002
p194).
But there’s nothing like to travel to broaden the mind, unless
you seek only to recreate your little slice of home in another
land. Real adventure begins when you reach out into the unknown.
Yet so few people in schools really seem to understand what
‘risk’ really means. But for a few notable exceptions (such as
those working for the Esther Benjamins Trust www. ebtrust.org.uk
for example) cursory gestures are as far as you get for fear of
genuine activity taking up too much leisure time. I mean, if an
experienced, energetic, responsible person came to you with a
great idea to contribute to a worthwhile, well-established
project, you wouldn’t say no, would you? To say ‘no’ you’d have
to have either a hidden agenda or just be plain stupid. As
Robert Browning wrote in ‘Andrea del Sarto’, (1855, 1, 97) “Ah,
but a man’s reach should always exceed his grasp, or what’s a
heaven for?”
Searching for the characteristics of the pioneer brought me back
to the International Baccalaureate Organisation (IBO) Primary
Years Programme (PYP) leaner profile. The PYP strives towards
“developing an international person” (IBO, 2000) and describes
such a person as possessing the following attributes and
dispositions: Inquirers, Thinkers, Communicators, Risk-takers,
Knowledgeable, Principled, Caring, Open-Minded, Well-balanced
and Reflective. The PYP also believes in the development of
positive attitudes towards people, the environment and learning.
The attitudes are: Appreciation, Commitment, Confidence,
Cooperation, Creativity, Curiosity, Empathy, Enthusiasm,
Independence, Integrity, Respect and Tolerance. (Making the PYP
Happen, IBO, 2000). Cross examination of these attributes and
attitudes with definitions of a pioneer and TCKs, reveals
considerable convergence.
Please support the Esther Benjamins Trust:
www.ebtrust.org.uk email: [email protected]
Next week: “The characteristics of the pioneer”.
|