Money matters:
Graham Macdonald MBMG International Ltd.
Will the rally in commodities eventually
weigh on the market? Part 1
Chart 1
Chart 2
Chart 3
Chart 4
Chart 5
Chart 6
Oil prices are on the march again! Crude oil was up by 5.8%
in one week in June. Seven days tend to be more of a blip than a trend but 1800%
annualised inflation ought to grab everyone’s attention and should prompt the
question, “Will the rally in commodities such as crude oil eventually weigh on
the market?”
Cobus Kellerman from MitonOptimal asks, “Is that what bonds are telling us (as
well)…?”
Bill Gross stated last week that he had turned bearish on bond prices for the
first time in more than twenty years. Given that he runs the world’s biggest
bond fund at PIMCO, I thought I’d show you why he may be right. The 1st chart
plots the price of the 30-year T-Bond since it bottomed in 1981. Bond prices
have been on a major bull market for the twenty-six years since then. But that
may be about to end. Bond prices are now threatening their long-term trendline.
In addition, bond prices are dangerously close to breaking support levels
(previous lows) for the first time in more than two decades. That danger can be
seen more closely in the 2nd chart. Bond prices peaked in 2003 and have been
trading sideways since then. A drop below the 2006 low near 105 would not only
break an important support level, it would also break the twenty-six year
support line.
When bond prices fall, yields rise. Chart 3 shows the 10-Year Treasury Note
Yield which is close to being a mirror image of bond prices in Chart 2. The key
level to watch in Chart 4 is the peak formed in the spring of 2006 near 5.25%. A
decisive close above that level would continue the pattern of rising peaks and
troughs that started in 2003 and would put bond yields at the highest level in
five years. The major significance of an upside breakout in bond yields is seen
in Chart 4. A close over 5.25% would break a down trendline in bond yields
connecting the highs of 1994 and 2000. That trendline spans thirteen years. An
upside penetration of that trendline would leave little doubt that the period of
low rates has ended.
One of the principles of inter-market analysis is that bond prices act as
leading indicators for stocks. In other words, bond prices peak and trough ahead
of the stock market. Take a look at Chart 5 the comparison of bond prices (price
bars) and the S&P 500 (solid line) during the 1980s. Bond prices bottomed in
1981. Stocks bottomed one year later in 1982. Two stock bear markets occurred in
the ten years following that bottom - in 1987 and 1990. In both cases, bond
prices peaked several months earlier.
Chart 6 compares bond and stock prices over the last ten years. The chart shows
that bond prices peaked in 1998, which was more than a year before stocks peaked
in 2000. The jump in rates during 1999 was one of the factors leading to the
stock market drop in 2000. Bond prices rose throughout the three-year bear
market in stocks lasting from 2000 to the end of 2002. That was largely due to
aggressive Fed easing due to fears of deflation. During deflation, bond prices
rise while stocks fall. Which brings us to the present. Bond prices peaked in
2003 as stocks bottomed. That was the result of asset switching out of bonds and
back into stocks. Since then, bond prices have just treaded water as stocks have
continued to rise. Two things on the chart worry me at the moment. One is a
potential breakdown in bond prices. The other is the fact that the S&P 500 (red
line) is testing potential resistance at its 2000 high. Falling bond prices
(rising bond yields) may not be an immediate threat to the stock market.
However, a significant breakdown in bond prices (upside breakout in yields)
would suggest that the bull market in stocks has entered a more dangerous stage.
To be continued…
The above data and research was compiled from sources
believed to be reliable. However, neither MBMG International Ltd nor its
officers can accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the above
article nor bear any responsibility for any losses achieved as a result of any
actions taken or not taken as a consequence of reading the above article. For
more information please contact Graham Macdonald on
[email protected]@mbmg-international.com.com
|
Snap Shots: by Harry Flashman
Photographic Physical abuse
Has
your camera become just one of the goods and chattels that make up your
inventory? No longer something to be cherished? No longer loved and
cared for? If so, you can start to expect poorer pictures any time now.
A camera is a highly sophisticated instrument, encompassing both physics
and electronic technology. It does not like disuse and it certainly does
not take kindly to physical abuse.
The first, and often the most common, is dropping the camera. Cameras
are very complex devices. The shutter on even the cheapest camera can
open and close in 1/500th of a second. You can imagine that it doesn’t
take much to knock the delicate shutter around.
The camera is also a lightproof box, dropping it and distorting the case
will soon let light in. And that goes for both film and digital cameras.
So what should be done beforehand? First is to have a decent padded
camera bag. It has to keep the camera safe in the situation of it
falling out of the car or slipping from the shoulder. Throw the silly
leather case, that many cameras come with, as far as you can, or feed it
to a goat.
OK, so you have the camera hanging on the strap around your neck, ready
for action. What can go wrong here? Well the strap can slip or the
eyelet rings can break, and the whole lot hits the floor unless you have
lightning reflexes. Answer? Check and make sure that everything is
correctly attached and not worn, especially the eyelet rings. When did
you check last? Replace regularly.
So it did hit the floor, what now? Turn it on. Is it still electrically
OK? If no power, take the batteries out and then put them back in - they
may just be jolted out of position. Unscrew the lens and put it back on.
Look through the viewfinder - if it looks normal, then try to take
several shots at different shutter speeds and apertures and rush to the
closest 1 hour processor or to the computer if it was a digital. Pray a
lot. You may be lucky.
After dropping, the next disaster is water. Cameras are not like
children, you cannot “drown proof” them. They stay drowned. If you are
going out to photograph in wet (or Songkran) weather, then you must take
precautions. A plastic bag wrapped around the camera with just the end
of the lens poking through, and held on with rubber bands is one way to
“safe photography”. Even then, as soon as possible you should take the
camera inside and dry the outside of the case thoroughly. Take the lens
off and dry carefully around the lens mount too, making sure you do not
touch the mirror. Take the batteries out and thoroughly dry the battery
compartment and the contacts. Batteries and moisture do not go well
together.
Now we should think about the great shots you can get on board the
speedboat and similar situations. Resist the temptation to take your
good camera - you can buy a waterproof Kodak or Fuji for very little
money and you can relax with peace of mind. Do not take your good one!
So what do you do when you have ignored the above advice and drop the
whole camera in the drink? If it is a modern electronic camera you have
probably just lost your investment - especially if it is salt water you
drop it into. One camera technician’s advice under that circumstance
was, “Leave it there!” However, you can try flushing the camera in
running tap water for at least an hour, then drying it and taking it to
the repair shop. An audience with the Pope would be a good move as well.
Drowning the camera in fresh water is not quite so bad, but you have to
pull it apart as much as you can and then dry it out as thoroughly as
you can - a hair dryer set on “No Heat” can help, but again your chances
are slim. This time it’s three Hail Mary’s and hope a lot.
First Aid is possible, but preventive maintenance is much better!
Modern Medicine:
by Dr. Iain Corness, Consultant
Love your work and live longer
Love your work and live longer? For many people that sounds
impossible. Why? Because so many people just do not enjoy their work.
I am sure you have heard the old adage - “when you enjoy your work, you
never have to work again”. And while that all sounds just a little trite, it
is actually based upon a well established medical fact.
As far as your overall health is concerned, is work important? Well, if you
take a look at statistics, then work is very important. Did you know, for
example, that more heart attacks and strokes occur on Monday mornings? But
that is for the working population only. Those who do not have to go to work
on Mondays do not share the same chilling statistics. Likewise, there is a
reduced incidence of cardiovascular calamities over the weekend.
Interesting!
So what should we do, other than all retire immediately? Well, that’s not
really practical, for one, and we need to make the dough to buy the bread,
or some other bakery simile. What we have to do is work out why Mondays are
so bad for our collective health.
What has been well documented is that following major catastrophes like
earthquakes, there is a significant increase in the number of heart attacks
for many days afterwards. The pundits say this is because of major stress,
and anyone who has lived through such a disaster would agree on the stress
side of it.
Now Mondays can hardly be called major stress, but for many people Mondays
do represent a chronic, recurrent stressor. So stressors do appear to be the
culprit. So what should we do about it?
Like all stressors, they are of two basic types, either “real” or
“imagined”. Unfortunately, no matter which type, they have the same effect
on us. By “real” stress I mean when the bank heavies are actually knocking
on your door and it’s pay up time on the arrears on the house payments or
eviction. “Imagined” stress is when you spend many hours worrying about what
would happen if you fell behind with the house payments, even though you
never have.
So to the dangerous Mondays. What do you stress about? The job itself? Is it
too difficult, too boring, too much high pressure? This is where you have to
sit down and look critically at yourself in relationship to your own work
and workplace. For many people, it is your own attitude that might have to
be modified. Change from being an unwilling worker to someone being a
willing worker, and work becomes totally different!
Remember the adage again “if you enjoy what are doing, you never have to
work again”. So if you really detest the job you are in, and it is just not
“you” then perhaps it is time to work out just what you really like doing
and start moving in that direction.
Of course, you must be a realist. Rome was not built in a day, and you are
not going to get the best paid, most fantastic job in the world tomorrow.
You move towards it - after you have worked out the field you want to be in.
The key to handling stress is first to admit that you are under it, then
following that, work out what the stressors are and then modify them, or
your attitude towards them. Taking charge of your own life, controlling it
yourself is the stepping stone towards good health and no unhealthy Mondays.
But then, perhaps all we need to do is get rid of Mondays altogether. In
fact, remove Monday from the calendar and you have a six day week - five
days on and one day off. This means you will get 52 “extra” days off every
year and never have Mondayitis again! That’s the answer!
Heart to Heart with Hillary
Dear Hillary,
What would you advise the man in this story? One lady kick out her Thai
husband because he don’t bring enough money home. They have at least one
small child. Then she went to Bangkok and to Pattaya where she worked in a
gogo bar. Short time later an entrepreneur form a European country get
married with her. She managed everything. They went to Isaan by a taxi. The
man want have only a small wedding party but the lady made a huge one. She
spend his money in a manner that even King Croesus from old Persia would
say, that is to much my darling. When goes home 5 km from a small city to
her village she gave to the driver 500 baht (the price was 30 baht). In this
manner she spend the money. The she borrowed much money. When the husband
came next year back from Europe he was quite shocked. When he went back
again to Europe, where he has a small company, he was not sure if he will
return again next year. He did not. But that was not a huge problem for the
lady, because they married by the monks only. Three months later she got
married to a new European man from a rich country on islands not far away
from the huge harbor in Europe (where the oil arrive from the OPEC
countries). (It was an incredible story for this approximately 60 years old
man, wasn’t it? Some ten thousands of Euro he had spend for this love
story.) The lady also gets 500,000 baht from a man from a middle east
country and 500,000 baht from a man from South Africa. Both wanted to marry
her. But she got married with this over 60 years old former teacher. (We can
only hope that he taught his students better.)
He build a house and a shop (similar 7-Eleven) for his wife (he get married
with her in the amphur too). He already had to go back to his country two
times to work somewhere to get more money because his pension is not enough
to build the house and the shop (one small house he built already) and as it
is known, a Farang can not have a house in Thailand; the house belong the
wife only.
The lady is already a little bit nervous because the building of the house
and of the shop go very slowly. The old man: what can he do? At the
beginning she said it is not important that the man is old. But now she said
her husband can not make love very much anymore.
Is this a never-ending love story? The time will decide and the lady will
not need to wait for very long time for the decision. What will she do then?
She is maybe 32 years ‘young’ only.
The story is sure a story that will never die out in Pattaya and around.
Helmut
Dear Helmut,
You are correct my Petal, (despite your quaint English, which you will have
to forgive me, but I did correct some spelling and grammar), this is a story
that will never die. The reasons are very simple - unfortunately, none of us
are perfect (not even me – now there’s a first!), and there will always be
people who are prepared to take advantage of others. This goes far beyond
the go-go bars of Pattaya, Chiang Mai or Phuket. You can also count in there
all the other cons, scams and bilks that we have been perpetrating on each
other for centuries. Black ink banknotes, Ponzi schemes, Nigerian money
emails, Pyramid schemes and “You buy me cola, darling” all have the same
basis. “I want your money. And you are silly enough (or greedy enough) to
fall for my tricks.”
Gorgeous 32 year old Thai women who work in go-go bars are not caressing
chrome poles because they are exhibitionists who like dancing. They are
using their bodies as bait, waiting for the suckers to come along and
swallow it hook, line and sinker. And they do, and they do, and they do!
Now, undoubtedly some of the chrome pole ladies are happy with their first
catch and retire from the nocturnal fishing park, but others are so much in
love with the financial rewards that their little scam has returned, that
they throw the bait out again, and again, and again. And what’s more, they
strike it lucky almost every time. There is an apparently never-ending
stream of suckers waiting their turn.
By the way, that goes for suckers for all the other scams I mentioned
before. Why do we all keep on getting “offers” from Nigeria where people
have $30 million they need to send overseas, and will give you 20 percent if
you will get involved and “help” them with this problem? Because no matter
how many times this scam is exposed, there are even more suckers waiting in
line.
It has been suggested that every unattached male who comes to this country
should be forced to read Stephen Leather’s book “Private Dancer” on the
plane before being allowed in. Unfortunately there will still be suckers.
Some of the bar girls are very skilled. “Buy me cola?” No, no, change that
to “Buy me champagne?”
Learn to Live to Learn: with Andrew Watson
Courage: the first of human qualities
Churchill said; “Courage is the first of human
qualities because it is the quality which guarantees all
others,” and I reckon he was right. At the heart of every action
there is a decision to be made and more often than not, courage
is required to take it. Courage enables wisdom and judgment and
effects change. Of course, it should be noted that Churchill’s
personal brand of courage isn’t to everybody’s liking, insofar
as he is viewed by more than one nation as something less than a
hero. But this isn’t about Churchill, it’s about the quality
that defeats fear.
I suppose at some time or another during everybody’s life, we
arrive at a situation where recognising the need to demonstrate
courage is necessary to overcome the obstacle in front of us. I
suspect also that everybody knows what it feels like to discover
that their reserves of courage are empty. For a plethora of
reasons, sometimes people do not rise to the challenge and
suffer a very personal kind of defeat, which manifests itself in
many kinds of ways. I shan’t ever forget the brazen, bulky,
bloke-ish, tattooed English bruiser who upon reaching the front
of the bungee jump queue, quailed, cowered and finally refused,
like a show-jumping horse, to make the leap. You just knew that
somewhere in Normandy that evening, he would be making a
beer-soaked attempt to reassert his masculinity.
It’s a very human instinct of course, to revert to
self-preservation when our equilibrium is threatened, but it’s
nonetheless fascinating to observe how this instinct manifests
itself and how it can contort an individual, producing an effect
which can then easily spread to a group. “Cowardice” has a bad
name, perhaps for good reason, but there is no doubt that in
certain circumstances, “cowardice” is the right decision and in
fact represents a courageous choice. Two examples follow which
perhaps illustrate that courage can take many different forms;
one personal, the other a well known conundrum.
I was twelve years old and was “bunking off” school for the
afternoon (I think there was an international soccer match I
wanted to watch). I made myself a cup of tea and settled down in
front of the television. After a couple of minutes I heard the
unmistakeable reverberations of rumblings on the stairs. I
opened the kitchen door in time to see four sets of boot-clad
feet moving swiftly towards the hall. In retrospect I realize
that they had heard me come in. For some reason, I thought they
must be friends of my elder brother’s. I didn’t twig they were
burglars at all. It was only seeing the shock in their eyes that
alerted to me to the possibility of something different. I was
standing by the front door as they approached me, dressed
unusually for the time of year (it was a hot May day) in
sheepskin coats and leather jackets. The leader of the group
spoke; “Have you been on the phone, then?” indicating the
telephone sitting next to me on a table. I hadn’t, but
instinctively I responded, “Yes”. Threateningly, this true
vulgarian passed this on to the others, “He’s been on the
phone”. Turning back to me, he announced, “We’ll be going then,”
and he reached past me to open the door. “Yes, you will,” I
thought, saying nothing and watching them break into a run as
soon as they were outside, and they disappeared down the street.
I remember my feelings very clearly. I felt angry and guilty
that I hadn’t done something to stop them. I wished I was
bigger, stronger, braver, cleverer. I felt so guilty that I
didn’t even relate the truth of the encounter to either the
police or my parents. I consoled myself that at least they
hadn’t got away with anything, which proved an almost comically
false assumption. The heavy coats they had been wearing as they
brushed past me turned out to be my father’s and brother’s and
their pockets had been stuffed full of my mother’s jewellery.
From memory, I had drawn pictures of them all after they had
scarpered and hilariously, I had them wearing these coats!
Looking back, I feel two things about this event. Firstly, that
more by luck than by judgment, I did the right thing and the
inadvertent lie about using the phone (an example of doing the
wrong thing for the right reasons), might very well have brought
the encounter to a swifter close than otherwise would have been
the case. Secondly, I feel utter disdain for the four
individuals who violated our home. Their actions bred in me a
lifelong contempt for burglars, who are in my view, the absolute
epitome of cowardice. How brave, to break into somebody’s home
and steal the fruits of another’s labour? I’m quite looking
forward to the next encounter.
The second example is one with which we are all no doubt
familiar, at least from our history lessons; “going over the
top” in the First World War. Surely no-one can seriously doubt
the raw courage of those sent to their inevitable and terrible
end. And what of those in Gallipoli, who recognised the futility
of their position to such an extent, that they left their
weapons behind in the trenches as they charged towards their
death? “Death smiles at as all; all we can do is smile back”
(Gladiator). But what of those who deserted, who saw the horror
ahead and chose life instead, at least until they were shot,
with appalling irony, for “cowardice”? What would we have done
in their situation? Would we have believed the old lie; Dulce et
Decorum est, Pro patria mori?
It has always fascinated me that courage seems to be a necessary
condition in good judgment and that one part of courage at
least, involves putting the welfare of others before oneself.
Sometimes this involves detaching one’s personal interests from
the issue at hand and defying rational and emotional impulse. A
pity then, to have witnessed so many examples of great teachers,
decried for doing just that.
Next week: Death smiles at us all.
Doc English, the Language Doctor: Buying the right books
for your child
Do you have, or are you expecting to have children in Thailand?
Are they struggling to learn two (or more) languages at the same
time? Are they bored and de-motivated with learning English? If
the answer to any of these questions is an emphatic ‘Yes!’ , then
this column is especially for you.
Perhaps you don’t have children, but may also have a partner or
friend whose first language is not English. If so, you may also
find this column useful.
Every week we will provide tips and techniques for teaching and
learning English at home. We hope you find them useful.
If you have any suggestions or questions about teaching English
at home, you can also write in to the Pattaya Mail, or email me
at: [email protected] and I will try to answer all
your questions, either by email or via this column.
This week, we go shopping for English books for your child!
Happy shopping!
Buying The Right Books For Your Child
Take your child to the book store and give them a budget for
books. You can also use books as a reward for good behaviour at
the end of the month. You will need to choose an even selection
of fiction and non-fiction books and you will need to find books
that separate into these categories:
1. Books that you want your child to read by themselves
2. Books that you want to read to your child
The books that you will read to your child can be slightly
harder (and a little more exciting), allowing your child to
develop their listening skills as well as their reading skills.
However, the books you want your child to read by themselves
should contain text and stories that are not too difficult for
them to read and understand.
You should guide your children to books that you feel meet their
language level, but you should also allow them some choice. It
is better if you can find a Reading Scheme. A ‘Reading Scheme’
is a series of books (usually stories) arranged in levels of
increasing difficulty. Stage 1 usually has few or even no words,
stage two has more words of one or two syllables, stage 3 has
more words, words with more syllables, more grammar patterns,
etc. Each Reading Scheme story may contain similar characters,
or stories on a similar theme, which makes it easier for your
child to relate to and means they don’t have to learn about a
load of new characters or situations each time they read.
I find the ‘Oxford Reading Tree’ Reading Scheme very good as
children seem to enjoy the characters and stories (no I’m not on
commission!). It also contains many ‘high frequency’, or common
words that children need to learn in order to progress in
English. However, any other reading scheme that roughly follows
an English, American or Australian curriculum will do. Books
printed in Asia are great because they are much cheaper and you
can afford to buy a lot; however, beware of buying books with
nice covers that contain dull stories and text. They may appear
child-friendly but in reality may be way too difficult for your
child (containing long, uncommon words, technical words, etc.).
When buying books specifically to read to your child, these can
be above their reading level. At first, try to find books that
reflect your child’s interests and your situation. For example,
books that contain lots of references to people, places or
situations not found in Thailand will be harder for your child
to understand and the stories harder to relate to.
Try to find books that appeal to you also, as your child may
reflect your taste in books. It’s important to talk about the
story during and after you read, so you want a story that
appeals to you both, otherwise you’ll have nothing to talk
about!
Finally, buy books, talking books, magazines and newspapers
(such as the Pattaya Mail!) regularly for yourself also. You
should keep lots of books and magazines on display around the
home and be seen by your child to be reading regularly, so that
they maintain a positive image of books and reading.
Next week - reading for the first time with your child.
Happy Reading!
Doc English
|