Money matters:
Graham Macdonald MBMG International Ltd.
Will the rally in commodities eventually
weigh on the market? Part 2
Chart 7
Chart 8
Chart 9
I believe that one of the factors keeping global rates
relatively low has been the weakness of Japan. That weakness has been largely
the result of a deflationary problem which is just now showing signs of
dissipating. [The threat of Asian deflation after 1998 was one of the factors
driving global bond yields to historically low levels].
The relative weakness of Japan (and rates near 1%) has acted as a weight on
global yields since then. Today’s announcement that Japan’s GDP was revised up
to 3.3% makes its economy potentially stronger than the U.S. or Europe. That
increases the odds for higher Japanese bond yields; which in turn increases the
odds for higher U.S. bond yields. That suggests to me that Japan may hold one of
the keys to the upward revision in global interest rates. Charts 7, 8 & 9 show a
similarity between Japanese stocks (Chart 7) and U.S. bond yields (Chart 8). To
make the point more graphically, the final Chart (9) overlays the Nikkei 225
(orange line) and the yield on the 10-Year T-Note yield since 1989. It looks to
me like the two lines have been closely correlated for the last 20 years. A
falling Japan from 1990 to 2003 acted as a depressant on U.S. bond yields. A
rising Japan is now having the opposite effect.
T-Bill yields have suddenly slumped (see chart 8)
This is the first big drop from a peak like this since early 2001 (i.e.,
the early days of the last recession). So what could be causing the current
T-Bill yield decline?
1) There was evidence of a distinct flight to safety from the jittery mortgage
securities market following the sub-prime meltdown.
2) There is also clear evidence of an impending US business cycle contraction.
US Eurodollar libor deposit rates haven’t budged which has caused the Ted spread
(Eurodollar yield minus T-Bill yield) to widen dramatically. This is really a
measure of credit market distress and therefore should be seen as a warning for
junk bond and emerging market debt credit spreads. As usual for wisdom on this
Michael Belkin is a good place to look - he believes that a junk bond market
dislocation is long overdue.
What does this mean for the US (and by implication global) economy? Well in the
real world real indicators are turning negative despite all the CNBC and
official/quasi official hype that things are
i) different this time
ii) have never been better
iii) are definitely no cause for alarm (why would they need to keep saying this
if they really believed either i) or ii) above)
There may be a further top in the latest market rally although there is clearly
now greater volatility and more downside action in the markets, but the stock
markets just measure forecasted sentiment; this is ephemeral. Every day living
and business conditions are real and the latest consumer sentiment reading (down
5 points from May according to the University of Michigan survey data) reflects
the impact on US consumers of higher fuel prices and lower housing value. Here’s
a question that isn’t being asked - if house prices gave fallen and this is just
temporary why aren’t people rushing into the market? Either they can’t (they’re
feeling the squeeze) or they don’t want to (they think that prices are geared
further south) or both! Whichever way, it’s bad news for the outlook and it
makes sense that Belkin’s extremely statistical analysis is forecasting a deeper
deterioration in consumer sentiment going forward.
So, taking all of that on board, how can you reconcile the recent rise in
longer-term US interest rates with the decline in T-Bill yields? Belkin draws a
comparison with the last recession when the 10Yr/3 month Treasury yield spread
went from zero to +350 basis points in 2001 as longer-term interest rates
remained static while the Fed forced short-term interest rates lower. This time
might not be too different although junk bond and emerging market debt excesses
are certainly more extreme now than they were in early 2001. These could be one
of the catalysts of a shock to the whole system: junk and emerging bond markets
could be the stronger aftershock of the initial sub-prime quake that shook the
markets in February.
So all of this is bleak for US consumer confidence, economic growth and
corporate earnings (exactly the opposite of the current Wall Street euphoria).
In fact in the US indices such as Utilities and Transports seem to have rolled
over and commenced a downtrend already. Watch the S&P500 and DJIA Industrials
carefully - they could still move higher but any decline over the next few weeks
could be signal the end of the innocence for all those who still believe the 3
hypes above.
Globally, it seems clear that UK, Italy, Spain and France are poised to follow
although the German picture is more open to short term question (there may be a
time delay). Emerging equity markets are in a long term uptrend but don’t be
surprised to see a fall of 40-50% short term. Sidelined but poised is a good
emerging equity stance right now.
Belkin think that energy stocks performance has boosted the market lately but
that “Energy stocks should trade down with the market, when stock indexes
finally break down. Energy stock outperformance has been the ‘hook’ that has
kept speculation going in the latest rally. When that hook fails, the tent might
collapse.”
The time isn’t now but it could be imminent.
Enjoy your day!
The above data and research was compiled from sources
believed to be reliable. However, neither MBMG International Ltd nor its
officers can accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the above
article nor bear any responsibility for any losses achieved as a result of any
actions taken or not taken as a consequence of reading the above article. For
more information please contact Graham Macdonald on
[email protected]@mbmg-international.com.com
|
Snap Shots: by Harry Flashman
The sky’s the limit
One of the more rewarding photographic subjects is the sky. It appears
in almost every outdoors picture and has so many different appearances,
from bright blue, to fluffy white clouds, sunsets, overcast and stormy
and finally the night sky. Plenty to choose from. And of course there is
always the Bangkok sky, noted for its homogenous all over dirty
off-white color!
There is not too much you can do about the Bangkok sky, but try using
the widest angle lens in the bag and you have a chance of getting a blue
sky background. The reason for this is that you are compressing more sky
into the 35 mm frame, so if there is any blue up there, you are
deepening the color.
However, very often, grey featureless sky cannot be avoided. If this is
the case, compose the shot to exclude the dull sky from the picture as
much as possible. There is a limit sometimes!
If you have access to a bunch of filters, there are other ways to make
the sky more interesting. Generally, you are trying to reduce the
contrast between the sky and the foreground, because the camera (film or
digital) cannot get both of them accurately exposed. So if the
foreground is white or bright you will need to dampen it down a bit, or
if the sky is too bright, then you have to deepen in to get closer to
the foreground exposure. This is where graduated filters will make life
easier. The Cokin style that slides up and down is best, and when you
have finished composing the shot, use the preview setting to see exactly
what you are going to get.
However, today’s automated cameras handle exposure well, especially when
your subject is set against a uniform background of blue sky, green
vegetation, or dark water. When your subject is against a background of
bright sky or water, the camera often underexposes your subject. Your
SLR camera has several ways to overcome this tendency, through use of
spot metering or by compensating to adjust exposure. Take the readings
from the brighter areas of sky or clouds to get better photographs. If
you do not have spot metering, then switch to manual mode under these
conditions, and take readings from different areas. Select the one which
will compensate for underexposure.
Having mentioned digital, these cameras have many advantages when you
are out shooting skies. One of the best features is the instant feedback
you get on your technique. You can review your exposure, composition,
and sharpness on screen, and shoot again if necessary. Today’s digital
SLRs are also fairly quiet. In low light, you can easily use 400 and
even 800 ISO settings without the ‘grainy’ look that equivalent films
produce.
There is also another very easy way to get your skies exposed correctly,
and that is by ‘bracketing’. This is where you take three shots, one at
the exposure you (or the camera) thinks it should be, then another one
stop more exposure and the third at one stop less exposure. You can do
five exposures if you like, though three is generally enough. Some of
the newer cameras (and professional ones) will do this automatically.
A few other tips when shooting skies, particularly if the sky is the
main subject: one is to hold the camera to give a horizontal horizon,
this being one of the most obvious. Drunken horizons will spoil even the
greatest sky shots. The other is not to place the horizon slap bang in
the middle of the frame, but make it at one third. If the sky is the
feature, then make if two thirds sky. Another tip is to take some shots
in the vertical (portrait) frame as well as the usual horizontal one.
Finally, when shooting rainbows, make the background a dark color if
possible. Dark and stormy clouds in the sky are ideal. The colors of the
rainbow stand out better against darker colors, but will blend into
light skies.
Remember, the sky’s the limit.
Modern Medicine:
by Dr. Iain Corness, Consultant
Gallstones - Fat, Fair, Female, Fertile and Forty
I have mentioned gallstones (cholelithiasis) before and used
the mnemonic Fat, Fair, Female, Fertile and Forty as being the catchy 5F’s
we used as medical students to remind us of the typical gallstone sufferer.
Of course, like all catchy mnemonics it isn’t quite true as 10 percent of
men can also have gallstone problems, and a fair percentage of the dusky
maidens get them and even infants and small children have been known to have
the problem.
Being one of those strange organs that lives somewhere within the abdomen,
many people are not really quite sure of where it is. Here’s how to find it.
Your liver is in the upper right side of the belly, just below the diaphragm
tucked under the ribs and the gall bladder, which manufactures the stones,
is attached to the underside of your liver and is involved with digestion.
The gallbladder is connected to the liver and the intestine, and its primary
role is to store the bile, which is produced by the liver, until the bile is
needed to aid in digestion.
Cholecystitis is an inflammation of the gallbladder that causes severe
abdominal pain. In 90 percent of cases, acute cholecystitis is caused by
gallstones obstructing the duct leading from the gallbladder.
Ninety percent of cholecystitis cases resolve spontaneously; however,
complications will develop in 10 percent of cases that will require surgery,
antibiotics or other treatments.
So where do these gallstones come from? Well, 80 percent of them are made up
of our old friend cholesterol, or cholesterol mixed with pigment, that’s why
you can get such pretty colors, though I am yet to see any made into a
necklace, but it could catch on I suppose. The cholesterol stays in solution
until something happens to slow down the emptying of the gall bladder, or
thicken the solution, such as happens during fasting (eating is good for
you). This results in what we call biliary “sludge” which then hardens and
turns into gallstones. So cholesterol can block more than just your coronary
arteries.
Factors which increase the likelihood of developing gallstones include
increasing age, obesity, a diet high in animal fats and certain medical
conditions such as diabetes. Oh yes, pregnancy also increases the incidence.
(With all these problems that can happen with procreation, it is a wonder
the human race has got this far!)
The management of gallstones has also changed dramatically over the past 20
years because of three main factors. The first was the development of
Ultrasound visualization. At last we had a way of accurately diagnosing
gallstones. Not only could we now “see” the gallstones, but we could tell if
they were the cause of the pain by being able to pick out inflammation in
the gall bladder wall.
The second development was ERCP (you know how we love acronyms in medicine)
which stands for Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography. At the end
of the operating telescope (called the Endoscope) the surgeon can sneak into
the bile duct and scoop out stones that are blocking the duct which has been
causing jaundice.
The third development was Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and was pioneered in
1987 by a French surgical team. Instead of practically sawing you in half to
get at the gall bladder, hiding under the liver as it does, this is a much
less invasive method, where the operating laparoscope is inserted through a
small incision in the abdominal wall, and the surgeon does the job under the
direct vision. While this results in less trauma, shorter hospitalization
and quicker recovery, it is not always successful and the operation may have
to be converted to the older “open” method.
It is also important to remember that gallstones can be found incidentally,
and if they are causing no problems, the answer is simply to leave them
alone. The chances of developing symptoms over 20 years are about 18 percent
the good books tell me, so with an 82 percent chance of getting off with
nothing, who is going to volunteer for an operation? What “gall” to even
suggest it!
Heart to Heart with Hillary
Dear Hillary,
I find that when I go to a shopping center these days I have become an
ogler. I just like to sit in a coffee shop and watch the women go by and try
and catch them with my eye. I’m not trying to pick them up or anything like
that, I just ogle. I’ve been doing this for a few months and I rotate around
the centers so that I’m not in the same one all the time. I’m worried that
this might be not normal, and will I go on to something anti-social or
something. Should I get help, or will it all pass, or will it get worse?
Ozzie
Dear Ozzie (the ogler),
My Petal, you do have a problem. You “try and catch them with your eye”, and
I take it that when you write “try” this means you are unsuccessful? That’s
impossible. Your eye contact would have been taken up 1,000 times by now,
since you’ve been at it “for a few months” by your own admission. You are
not the only one hanging around shopping centers giving people the glad eye,
but the others are women trying to pick up men. I think you have to be
honest with yourself (and me) and find the reasons why you flit from
shopping center to shopping center. Are you afraid of these women? Time you
just let nature run its course. Have fun with your eyes and stop worrying
about deep and meaningful consequences. You certainly won’t get any deep and
meaningful relationships from the benches in a shopping center, that is for
sure.
Dear Hillary,
Why do all these middle-aged guys with tattoos want to walk around with no
shirts on? I see them every day, if it’s not no shirt then it’s those silly
strappy singlets. Do they think it makes them look sexy or what? Do you
think it’s sexy, Hillary, and do you have a tattoo in a secret place
somewhere?
Tatt
Dear Tatt,
If I show you mine, will you show me yours? Sorry Tatt, it’s no contest,
because my beautiful body is as yet unmarked, or “un-inked”. But getting
back to your real question, Petal, the only reason the chaps with the tatts
wear those strappy singlets, as you call them, is to display their ink
designs. They must think they are sexy, or they wouldn’t do it, just for the
same reason we ladies will wear a décolleté to attract the male. It’s
terrible primeval, and in Thailand quite unnecessary. Just wear your wallet
on a rope around your neck with the contents plainly displayed (large
denomination notes are recommended) and you’ll have them hanging off you
like flies on one of those sticky paper rolls. By the way, Tatt, if a lady
has a tattoo on her breast is that a tatt for tit? Ooh, I am naughty today!
Dear Hillary,
Each week I read your column and do enjoy a laugh, but nobody drives them to
do it but themselves. I do want to write about rip-offs though, as every
second letter seems to be about some poor sod who get carried away, hands
over great chunks of money and of course never sees the end result,
especially if this is for houses for Mamma and Pappa or a pig farm up
country. There is another side to it all though, and I want you and the
readers to hear about my tale. I had been here for about six months and got
to know a girl (from the bar) very well. The relationship had gone past the
usual “Hello sexy man” and I began to have some serious thoughts about
having a more permanent state of affairs. Just after I heard that I had to
go back to England, she asked me for 100,000 baht which she wanted to get
set up in the small Thai restaurant where we would eat some nights. She
promised to pay me back in six months after I came back. I’m not the richest
sucker in the world, but I could afford the 1500 pounds at that time, so I
shelled out and left. She stayed in touch and when I came back after six
months, she paid me back in full, and I had a free dinner in her little
restaurant. They’re not all as bad as some people would paint them Hillary.
Bill the Banker
Dear Bill the Banker,
Aren’t you the nicest man, and I am glad you were not let down. However,
there are a few pointers for others reading your letter to ponder over. You
had not met the girl two weeks before, in fact you had known her for six
months (still not a long relationship, but better than two weeks). You had
also formed a relationship with her and were even contemplating something
more deep and meaningful, so much so that the pair of you kept in touch. You
could also afford to lose the money - it wasn’t your life savings, so the
risk was quantified. You had seen where the money was going to go. The
bemoaning souls who write to me have met the girl during the two week
holiday and lose the lot. That was not your situation, Petal. However, Bill,
I’d like to buy this small champagne vineyard in France …
Learn to Live to Learn: with Andrew Watson
Death smiles at us all
“Death smiles at us all; sometimes all we can do
is smile back,” were the words that set the seal on Russell
Crowe’s final, if inevitable victory over Joaquin Phoenix (real
name Joaquin Bottom, according to “Wikipedia”) in “Gladiator”.
It takes time to arrive at the point where you’re just happy to
take your time and savour every second. Sometimes of course, it
takes a catastrophe. If I dwell on it for long, I can easily
become upset thinking about the number of lovely people I have
known who haven’t made it, a feeling exacerbated by seeing those
less worthy still alive. I can’t accept that the “good die
young”, it simply won’t suffice.
It’s tempting, indeed natural, to search for logic where there
is none. I’d like to think that God punishes those who have it
coming, or that Karma sees them get what they deserve, but
whilst I can see the reason in the concept that those who
perpetrate evil are themselves devoured by it, there’s just too
much gratuitous, unnecessary injustice and violence in the world
for me to accept that there’s any divine retribution afoot.
Instances of comeuppance seem left to chance; more often that
not, coincidental.
I was in London recently. For the first time in ten years I had
the outrageous pleasure to witness the citrus colours of autumn.
Orange and red cadmiums sank into startling spectrum reds along
a riverside canvas that unseeing onlookers are prone to describe
as “grey” but which is, in fact, all subtle raw umbers and low
greens. It was wonderful. That dirty old river, the Thames, had
a distinctly chilled glint about it as it edged forwards like a
great protective serpent around its nest. It was all
surprisingly still, as if the swelter of summer had worn London
ragged and the great city was ready for its winter hibernation.
Except that London, like many a modern metropolis, is in little
need of rest. It veritably hums with the to-ing and fro-ing of a
million or more, milling “like flies around Waterloo
underground” (Davies, ’67) and any other place you might care to
mention.
Despite maintaining a residence in the city of my birth, I felt
like a stranger. It has been much the same whenever I have
returned in my decade away; ten years of increasingly rapid
change, or so it would appear. But I enjoy taking the time to
wander at leisure through the alleys along which I used to
scurry for no justifiable reason. It helps to know the tricks of
course; where to go and when, so as not be caught up in some
terrible jam. I am a convert to London’s public transport
system. Despite being disgustingly over-priced, it’s still
cheaper than it was (in real terms) and it seemed to me that I
got everywhere I needed to go in extremely impressive time.
Thank you Ken Livingstone, resurrected Lord Mayor of London (he
must still be giving Thatcher nightmares).
I’m never entirely sure how this has happened, but my good
fortune has allowed me an apartment situated on the river,
adjacent to the MI5 building on Vauxhall Bridge. From the
balcony, the cream of London’s landmarks old and new, are on
view; the Houses of Parliament, the London Eye and Westminster
Abbey. It’s a short walk across the river, past the “old” Tate
and Millbank to Parliament Square, where a recently unveiled and
appropriately animate statue of Nelson Mandela outshines most of
the other sculptures, save perhaps the guardian figure of
Churchill. But what, I wondered, is Smuts of South Africa doing
there, alongside Palmerston and Pitt? And there’s David Lloyd
George (no doubting his pedigree), cast in cartoon venetian red
with flowing wizard-esque cloak, looking rather like an escapee
from “Toy Story”.
Ever since reading “The da Vinci Code” I have hankered after a
visit to Westminster Abbey, but had hitherto, for some
hedonistic reason or other, never found the time. Now, suddenly,
I had both the time and the inclination. And yet I did not
enter. The entrance price for everybody (no double pricing here
save for “worshippers”) is 10 (ten) pounds, about 650 baht. If
you’re a “worshipper” you get in for nothing. Now, I “worship”
as it happens, but somehow I thought it beneath my dignity to
have my prayers at the behest of someone else. By which I mean,
if I pay ten quid, does that mean I cannot pray? Or does it mean
that if I do pay, that I get a pound back for every “Amen”? I
was reminded of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem,
where upon exiting the narrow sanctuary of Christ’s supposed
tomb, a monk bungs a candle into your hand and holds out his own
expectantly with the words, “10 shekels for the candle”.
Already!
I wanted to learn more about the clandestine larceny of the
Abbey, so I found a corpulent, cheerful, cockney warden,
guardian of the entrance to the southern nave. He must have seen
me coming. “When,” I inquired politely (I may have had a hint of
a smirk on my face) “did they start charging for entrance to the
Abbey?” He didn’t bat an eyelid; he’d heard it all before;
“1697” he replied with a confident grin, “3D (three pence): it
was a lot of money in those days”. “Yes, well ten pounds is
quite a lot of money now.” I retorted. He wasn’t impressed and I
was on my way. “I’ll come back on a Sunday,” I called.
I have to admit that my stroll that day did have an ulterior
motive. I was heading for Smithfields, the market made famous
for its meat and in particular, I was looking for a tiny alley
called “Cloth Court,” reeking with history. On the fifth floor
(they call it the third but believe me it’s a long way up) of a
winding staircase at number two, the Esther Benjamins Trust has
its London headquarters. There, it was my happy duty to hand
over a cheque for 1,300 US dollars, representing the cumulative
generosity of children aged 3-18 who attended the hugely
successful Garden International School of Football last year,
one incredibly generous student in particular called “Smile” and
the Pattaya Mail, spreading the culture of giving, far and wide.
Now there’s a legacy worth leaving behind. But more of this,
next week.
Next week: It is in giving that we receive.
Doc English, the Language Doctor: Reading for the first time
with your child
Hello folks, the English Surgery is now open! For the benefit of
any newcomers, this column includes tips and techniques for
teaching your children English at home. I hope you find them
useful. For the next few weeks we are concentrating on teaching
your child to enjoy reading.
Last week we went shopping for books and I hope you now have a
number of interesting story books that are suitable for your
child. This week, I will discuss how to create an effective
learning environment at home, where children will feel
comfortable and happy learning English.
First, choose a regular time and place to read and share your
books. Choose somewhere quiet, away from any distractions and
somewhere where you will not easily be disturbed. Bedtime
reading is a great idea, as it allows your child to think more
deeply about the story as they drift off to sleep. However, make
sure your child is not too sleepy when you start as you want
them to interact a little bit!
I find that my younger students like to choose a quiet corner of
the room in which to sit and read, when reading by themselves.
It helps if the area is comfortable, with lots of cushions and
maybe soft toys and puppets to allow them to role play the story
with their friends after they have read. Over time, you should
allow your child to build up their own library of books.
Children enjoy exchanging books with friends. Encourage them to
do this and to share what they have learnt from their books with
their friends. Invite friends over for ‘reading parties’ or
start a book club with other parents and have parents and
children all read together on a regular basis.
Use books as a reward over time for your child’s good behaviour.
You will soon build up an impressive collection of books this
way and eradicate bad behaviour at the same time! You could also
include a CD player or recording ‘device’ in your new library,
so as to allow your child to listen to (and create their own)
talking books. Include also stationery, scrap paper, colours,
etc., to allow your child to draw illustrations from their
stories and to create their own simple books.
From my experiences as a teacher, I have noticed that my
students progress in English at a much faster rate if their
parents are reading regularly with them at home. Often it seems
that students that spend less time reading at home are less
interested in books and stories. Students that don’t read at
home also appear less motivated to learn and speak English.
Reading with your child on a regular basis is essential to their
success in English, as once the child is reading independently,
they are soon able to teach themselves. Encourage your child to
enjoy reading please! Just twenty minutes a day can make a BIG
difference to your child’s development in English, believe me!
Next week, we look at the power of prediction and how to
encourage your child to talk about and discuss their story books
before they read. I hope you enjoy creating your little library
together this week and sharing your new books with your friends.
You can write to the Pattaya Mail or email me at
docenglishpattaya@gmail .com and I will try to answer your
questions or suggestions, either by returning an email or
through this column. Your feedback is most welcome.
Best regards,
Doc English
|