![](../images/PMPortal-5-copy_07.jpg) |
|
![](../images/PMPortal-5-copy_23.jpg) |
AUTO MANIA:
by Dr. Iain Corness |
|
![](../au21.gif)
Italian Grand Prix this weekend
![](pictures/au1%20monza.jpg)
Monza
Think of the great race at Spa in Belgium last week, and
now pray for the same at Monza in Italy. This is another driver’s circuit;
however, like many other circuits, Monza has not been a single layout, but a
series of more than a dozen layouts which have ranged in length from 2.4 km
to 9 km.
The circuit was opened in the Monza Royal Park, near Milan, in 1922 and
featured bankings, though these were demolished in 1939. The bankings which
featured in some races, 1955-69, were new structures built on the format of
the original. Bankings were used for the Italian GP in 1955, ‘56, ‘60 and
‘61, and were last used for racing of any form in 1969 when the concrete
became in need of substantial resurfacing and rebuilding.
The 1971 Italian GP holds the record for the fastest-ever Formula One race
but, emphatically, that is not the same as saying the fastest race for Grand
Prix cars. That honor remains in the possession of the 1937 Avusrennen with
Rosemeyer in the Auto Union recording a 276 km/h lap (that’s about 165 mph).
After 1971, the circuit underwent some revisions to discourage slipstreaming
and to lower the average lap speed. Chicanes were added in 1976 and, in
1994, the second Lesmo Bend was tightened and the Curve Grande was
re-profiled.
The World Championship which Alonso has his eye on, is not a 100 percent
surety yet and is still quite open, with seven more GPs after this one (175
points up for grabs). We can expect that the main protagonists will still be
trying very hard, in particular Alonso, racing in front of the passionate
Ferrari fans. We will be watching from our perches at Jameson’s Irish Pub
(Soi AR, next to Nova Park) and the racing commences at 7 p.m., but join us
around 6 p.m. for dinner (I do recommend the Sunday specials), and a beer
and a chat before the race begins at 7 p.m. We watch on the giant screen,
with the dedicated F1 telecast which is of top value and there are no
adverts during the race!
|
|
![](../me-top.gif) |
What did we learn from the Belgian Grand Prix?
What a start! If crashes are your game, then the Spa GP gave
you that within 10 seconds of the start, with Grosjean (“Lotus”) clipping
Hamilton (McLaren) then flying over Alonso’s Ferrari who then took out Perez
(Sauber). Much deliberation by the stewards resulted in Grosjean being banned
for the next race (Italian GP this weekend). A fair penalty? Review of the video
footage shows Grosjean coming across Hamilton’s line, and his rear wheel hits
Hamilton’s front. I would contend that despite Grosjean’s poor judgment, if
Hamilton had braked and let him in, then the incident would not have occurred.
Remember that this was on the run to the first corner, the corner where you do
not win races, you only lose races. Asked about the accident by the BBC,
Grosjean said, “It was a good start, then a big boom.” It certainly was!
The other enfant terrible Pastor Maldonado (Williams) looked as if he had done
the start of the century from the third row of the grid, but like most things
which look to be too good to be true, generally aren’t! It was judged to be a
jump start, and the FIA has sophisticated electronics which can show this. That
alone gave him a five place grid penalty for this Italian GP, but then Pastor
had another of his brain fade moments and clobbered another car, putting himself
out of the race and garnering another five place grid penalty on top of the
other one. I am quite sure that it is only Maldonado’s USD 46,000,000
contribution to the Williams budget that keeps him in the seat. Or am I being
cynical?
The star of the show was Jenson Button who was a clear head and shoulders above
the rest at Spa. He was the only driver to dominate all three sections of
Qualifying and then just ran away and hid, and was never challenged in the race.
His team mate Hamilton really had the pouts all weekend, something he is good
at. A wrong choice of wing left him floundering, but then he went public on
Twitter where he posted a series of angry comments following the decision to use
a different rear-wing to that of Button. “Damn, WTF!! Jenson has the new rear
wing on, I have the old. We voted to change, didn’t work out. I lose 0.4 tenths
just on the straight.” If that wasn’t enough he then published the data-logging
sheets, where according to BBC Sport, “the telemetry sheet not only contained
traces of the two drivers’ laps, showing where Hamilton was losing time to
Button, but also information about the car’s settings, including sensitive data
such as its ride height.” Hamilton is petulant and impetuous, I am afraid.
Other drivers worth a mention included “The Finger” Vettel (Red Bull) who
scrapped his way into second and Raikkonen (“Lotus”) who fought a car which was
not to his liking into third.
An interesting fight between Vettel and Schumacher (Mercedes) with both drivers
giving everything. Vettel stating that “it doesn’t matter where you get Michael
on the circuit, he will fight like hell - he hasn’t lost it.” He certainly has
not, and if Ross Brawn could only come up with a half decent race car, you could
expect to see Michael Schumacher on the podium top step.
Other drivers of note include Hulkenberg (Force India), Vergne and Ricciardo
(Toro Rosso) who all finished in the top 10 and deservedly so.
Now let’s see what happens in Italy this weekend!
|
|
Retro Racing this weekend at Bira
![](pictures/aut2retro%20racing.jpg)
racing at Bira.
The Nitto 3K series is on again at the local Bira circuit
(Highway 36, about three km past the Regents School heading towards Sattahip).
We were racing against time with our Securitas Retro Escort Mk 1 which was
severely damaged at the last meeting, requiring a full rebuild, both chassis and
body. We had hoped to be there, but as I write this it looks highly unlikely.
The spirits conspired against us sending down the rain which delayed undercoat
and painting until it will be too late. The racing is always exciting in the
Retro Classes, but this time I am sure the little white Securitas Escort will be
missing!
|
|
Dual-clutch Transmissions
![](pictures/au3kegresse.jpg)
Kegresse Half Track.
You may have noticed the appearance of “double clutch”
technology recently. What is this new breakthrough? DCT or PDK, both refer to
dual clutch transmissions, or for Porsche it is “Porsche Dual Klutch” and hence
PDK (the Germans like to be different - especially Porsche). However, like most
things automotive, this ‘new’ development in transmissions is anything but new.
The man who invented the dual-clutch gearbox was Adolphe Kégresse, the
automotive engineer to the Russian Royal family, who is best remembered for
developing the half-track, a type of vehicle with military applications,
equipped with endless rubber treads allowing it to drive off-road over various
forms of terrain. That was 1902. In 1939, Kégresse conceived the idea for a
dual-clutch gearbox, but unfortunately, adverse business circumstances (call it
WWII if you like) prevented further development.
How does DCT work? A dual-clutch transmission offers the function of two manual
gearboxes in one. In a standard manual gearbox there are usually five gears and
one clutch to split the transmission from the engine torque input. A dual-clutch
gearbox, by contrast, uses two clutches. Instead of the left foot clutch pedal,
sophisticated electronics and hydraulics control the clutches, just as they do
in a standard automatic transmission. In a DCT, however, the clutches operate
independently of each other. One clutch controls the odd gears (first, third,
fifth and reverse), while the other controls the even gears (second, fourth and
even sixth - in a six speed). Using this arrangement, gears can be changed
without interrupting the power flow from the engine to the transmission. In some
ways this is similar to Captain Wilson’s ENV pre-selector gearbox (remember
it?), where one ratio could be selected whilst you were still in another ratio.
Even reverse, though this was frowned upon.
The way DCT works is quite unusual. A two-part transmission shaft is at the
heart of a DCT. Unlike a conventional manual gearbox, which houses all of its
gears on a single input shaft, DCT splits up odd and even gears on two input
shafts. To be able to do this, the outer shaft is hollow, making room for an
inner shaft, which is nested inside. The outer hollow shaft feeds second and
fourth gears, while the inner shaft feeds first, third and fifth.
With DCT, no left leg or left hand is needed and it can do upshifts in a mere 8
milliseconds, and many drivers now feel that the DCT offers the quickest
acceleration times of any vehicle on the market. It certainly offers smooth
acceleration by eliminating the shift shock that accompanies gearshifts in
manual transmissions and even some automatics. Best of all, it affords drivers
the luxury of choosing whether they prefer to control the shifting themselves or
let the computer do all of the work. And in most instances, the computer knows
best!
With the world’s attention on fuel economy, perhaps the most compelling
advantage of a DCT is a claimed improvement in economy. Because the power flow
from the engine to the transmission is not interrupted followed by a call for
more fuel by the engine, fuel efficiency increases dramatically. It is claimed
that a six-speed DCT can deliver up to a 10 percent increase in relative fuel
efficiency when compared to a conventional five-speed automatic. That is
impressive numbers!
|
|
Natter Nosh and Noggin
The next car club meeting will be at Jameson’s Irish Pub on
Soi AR next to Nova Park. The next meeting is on Monday September 10 at
Jameson’s at 7 p.m. A totally informal meeting of like-minded souls to discuss
their pet motoring (and motorcycling) loves and hates (plus lies and outright
exaggerations). Come along and meet the guys who have a common interest in cars
and bikes, and enjoy the Jameson’s specials, washed down with a few beers.
Always a fun night. Be prepared to laugh a lot at some of the antics of the
members (when they were younger)! The Car Club nights are always on the second
Monday of the month (not every second Monday)!
|
|
Autotrivia quiz
Last week, I mentioned the mighty Mercedes W 125. I noted
that they ran a leather strap over the bonnet at Donnington and not at the
German GP. I asked why? Very simple, it was British scrutineers who insisted
that all bonnets had to have a leather strap, even though the Mercedes closing
system was better than a bit of cow across the bonnet. The Europeans accepted
the Mercedes technology, while the Brits didn’t. There you are, ‘real’ trivia!
So to this week. What car carried its own commuter bicycle beside the driver and
passenger?
For the Automania free beer this week, be the first correct answer to email
[email protected]
|
|
![](../images/PMPortal-5-copy_18.jpg) |
|
![](../images/PMPortal-5-copy_07.jpg) |