Money matters:
Graham Macdonald
MBMG International Ltd.
Nominated for the Lorenzo Natali Prize
This is not the time to have your head in the sand, Part 1
Today we have a special report from Tim Price - Director PFP Wealth Management
and Scott Campbell - Fund Manager MitonOptimal.
Valuation Vs The Momentum Trade
Scott Campbell, Managing Director and Fund
Manager
Many multitudes of commentators are pointing out the blinding
glimpse of the obvious. “Would you prefer a regular income likely to rise at
least as fast as inflation or a lower fixed income with no prospect of
increases?” Many dividend yields on blue chip global companies now offer a
higher income yield than government bonds in the US, UK, Europe and Japan.
Historically high dividend yields vs 10 year Government Bond yields is a buying
opportunity for stocks, particularly in deflationary Japan. P/E multiples are at
levels not seen for a generation, free cash flow is fantastic and balance sheets
are great. Recent M&A shows that CEO’s think there is value plus value, fund
managers are jumping out of their skin! The valuation argument is equally as
compelling as it was in 2008/09.
The following two charts from Investec show how in June 2008
corporate bonds and equities were then at valuation levels considered cheap.
They then proceeded to fall 30% or more! In fact Government Bond yields were at
30 year highs in June 2008; i.e., the most expensive for three decades, and then
proceeded to go higher!
Clearly values are much better in developed world equities
after indices have gone nowhere for 10 years. However, economic fundamentals are
not looking good for the rest of the year. As 1999 or 2008 showed, valuation
alone is not a great predictor of short term movement either way and the market
can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.
Die Hard, with a vengeance
Tim Price, Director of
Investment PFP Wealth Management
“Money is like manure. You have to spread it around or it
smells.” - J. Paul Getty.
When it comes to dying hard, the cult of equities has few
peers. You might have thought that the dot.com bust, the Enron / Worldcom
scandals, the recent cascade of banking crises and the current widening
stagflation would have beaten equity investors into some kind of sense of
submission or at least acceptance by now. Not a bit of it.
Notwithstanding the fact that global equity markets, as
defined by the MSCI World Equity Index, are currently 22% below their
level at the start of 2000, let alone a third below their highs of Q3
2007, the investment media continue breathlessly to report their every move.
One can only conclude either that the modern equity investor
is a glutton for punishment, or that the modern media producer is a sadist. The
average radio or TV business report, if it offers any coverage of markets
whatsoever, will tend to focus exclusively on the performance of equity indices.
Even interest rates, for example, barely get a look in.
Open a typical newspaper, journal or even financial magazine,
and see how much coverage - if any - is given to any other asset class than
common stocks. For that matter, consider how much focus the fund management
industry (retail or institutional) places upon equity vehicles as opposed to any
other.
While many funds may be launched whereas few will ultimately
be chosen, it represents a real triumph of marketing over relevance to continue
to peddle products that few consumers are likely to need, let alone want. The
financial services industry surely attained critical mass by way of long-only
equity variety years ago - and the growth of exchange-traded funds has not
exactly diminished choice.
It is testimony to the lingering attraction of the equity
myth that it continues to this day to drive the production of redundant product
by an endless array of me-too providers. Of course not all funds are bad, and
not all equity funds are bad; but the signal to noise ratio, given the
population of the managed fund universe, has to be low. Most critically, in the
context of managed funds, know what you own - which will take some of the
sting out of any exposure to managed equities in the context of a potential bear
market.
To be continued…
The above data and research was compiled from sources
believed to be reliable. However, neither MBMG International Ltd nor its
officers can accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the above
article nor bear any responsibility for any losses achieved as a result of any
actions taken or not taken as a consequence of reading the above article. For
more information please contact Graham Macdonald on [email protected]
|
|