Money matters:
Graham Macdonald MBMG International Ltd.
Liquidity and Property, part 2
From last week: … borrowers will now ONLY lend 95% of
asset value to borrowers who aren’t prime and in many cases can’t/won’t document
their income. Not only were they lending 100% to this category before, in many
cases they were lending more than 100%. The assumption here seems to be that
lending 100% today to non-prime borrowers (remember that the importance of the
security or the loan to asset value becomes more significant as the credit
status of the borrower worsens) will be Ok because the loan won’t go wrong and
if it does then in a year’s time the asset will be worth 115% of today’s value,
so a 100 or 105% loan to value doesn’t constitute risk. Consumers borrowed 100
percent of their home’s value on about 18 percent of Alt A loans (loans between
sub prime and prime) made last year, according to Bear Stearns, the largest
mortgage-bond underwriter. Another 16 percent had loan-to-value ratios above 90
percent as well as limited documentation, they say.
The actual lenders themselves aren’t concerned about risk because after all
they’ll sell it on soon enough, but what’s forcing them to change their criteria
is that the market no longer wants to touch these riskier loans or at least a
smaller number of interested buyers will be paying the lenders much lower prices
for them.
It’s the fact that Bear Stearns Cos., General Electric Co.’s WMC Mortgage,
Countrywide Financial Corp., IndyMac Bancorp Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc.,
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Credit Suisse have all said in the last two
weeks they’re pulling back from buying Alt A mortgages sold with no down payment
or in a refinancing of the house’s entire value that is forcing the lenders to
adjust their criteria rather than the fact that there will be huge defaults. If
you don’t plan to own the loan book yourself you don’t care how it performs, as
long as you can sell it.
Anyone who can’t see the madness of that line of thinking probably shouldn’t be
allowed out on their own.
Last year the Alt A category accounted for about 20 percent of the $3 trillion
of U.S. mortgages, about the same as sub-prime loans, up from 5% in 2002
according to Credit Suisse Group, highlighting where much of the growth in US
lending has occurred.
Tighter lending standards may slash sub-prime mortgage sales in half this year
and Alt A mortgages by a quarter, according to Ivy Zelman, a Credit Suisse
analyst in New York who covers homebuilders. The new requirements will force
some prospective homebuyers to save more money for a down payment or risk being
denied credit - the boom in the US property market has been fired by: 1) people
and corporations being able to trade up properties and acquire properties more
readily because these have been more affordable at such low interest rates; 2)
people who will be able to obtain credit at some point but should currently be
saving up their deposits being offered deposit free terms now; 3) people who by
any logical commercial criteria shouldn’t really be able to currently obtain
credit of such magnitude being offered it left, right and centre.
All of this has compressed future demand - those without deposits and whose
incomes aren’t yet sufficient to service the debts or whose circumstances aren’t
sufficiently robust to ride through any short-term financial storms have been
given credit that will in many cases lead to defaults, repos, and damaged
credit, and instead of providing an economic boost, this will become a major
economic drag. The category comprised about 5 percent of new loans in 2002,
according to Credit Suisse.
Late payments of at least 60 days and defaults on Alt A mortgages have risen
about as fast as on sub prime ones, to about 2.4 percent, according to bond
analysts at UBS AG. What a surprise - people refusing to document their ability
to pay are maintaining their loans to a similar standard as those with documents
signifying poor ability to pay. Loans in the category made to borrowers with low
credit scores, equity and documentation are doing about as badly as sub prime
loans, according to Citigroup Inc. and Bear Stearns analysts. Rapid credit
tightening that’s “been isolated to the sub prime world has really migrated’’ in
the past two weeks to Alt A offerings that involve borrowing nearly all of a
home’s worth, said Brian Simon, senior vice president at Mount Laurel, New
Jersey-based mortgage bank Freedom Mortgage Corp. Bear Stearns will finance 25
percent to 30 percent fewer non-prime mortgages this year as it tightens credit,
Chief Financial Officer Sam Molinaro said on the company’s earnings call
recently.
The impact here is 2-fold:
1) The market will continue to slow because the artificial stimulation of loans
to people who won’t (or in the case of Alt A probably can’t) service them is
going to be taken away. The market will weaken, asset values will continue to
fall, better quality credit will start to suffer and defaults and repos will
become more widespread. Credit will tighten in this slowing market, causing it
to slow further, asset values will fall further, even better quality credit will
start to suffer and defaults and repos will become even more widespread. the
market will weaken even further, etc., etc. This is a difficult spiral to get
out of until the market finds its floor and we don’t believe that Pimco’s Bill
Gross is right in his assertions that aggressive rate cutting now can help to
stem this spiral.
2) Lenders will be stuck with debt that they can’t sell profitably - many will
suffer losses. Apart from the further contraction in credit that this will
cause, the problems will filter through the financial system until the likes of
Bear Stearns, Goldmans, etc., find their own books severely tested. We believe
that there will be further corporate casualties in this market - we’re just not
sure how many or how big. This could ultimately be an even greater problem than
the S&L crisis and the impact on the general economy could be catastrophic.
The bottom line is that in the UK and the US too much money has been thrown
(almost literally) at sectors where the growth has been too hot for too long
with no regard to what will happen when the trend turns. This is also true in
varying extents in economies like Ireland, Spain and Australia.
What can you do to protect/profit from this? That’s easy - Property Protector is
an insurance product that protects the value of existing properties or an
investment product that allows investors to gain from the falling price of
properties. Which version you require depends on your circumstances but I can’t
imagine that there’s anyone out there who shouldn’t be at least looking at this
in some format.
The above data and research was compiled from sources
believed to be reliable. However, neither MBMG International Ltd nor its
officers can accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the above
article nor bear any responsibility for any losses achieved as a result of any
actions taken or not taken as a consequence of reading the above article. For
more information please contact Graham Macdonald on
[email protected]@mbmg-international.com.com
|
Snap Shots: by Harry Flashman
The 10 golden rules of daylight portraiture
Why
do we take so many pictures of people? Ever stopped to wonder? We like
them, we love them, we want to remember them, and so the list goes on.
It makes no difference, ‘people’ shots are what we take 75 percent of
the time.
Now how many of your people shots are great? How many are average? And
how many are just OK and get left in the drawer? For most people, their
people shots tend to be of the last category. However, do not despair,
this week here are the 10 golden rules, so that you too can get results
just like the local “professional” photo shop. It doesn’t depend upon
what type of camera you have, it just needs you to do a little planning.
Rule 1. Walk in closer. It is the single most important tip to better
portraits. Even with a point and shoot compact, walk in till the subject
fills the viewfinder from the waist up.
Rule 2. If you have a camera with a “portrait mode” then use it! This is
one area where I agree with the manufacturers. The portrait mode with
modern cameras does work. It maximizes the settings to produce the most
pleasing effect, gets rid of backgrounds and sets the exposure to allow
for the best skin tones. Use it.
Rule 3. Use the flash in daylight. If you have a fancy camera with “Fill
Flash” facility, then turn it on and you will see the prints you get
back from the photo processor have now got sparkle and punch. If you
have not, but have a flash you mount on top of the camera, use it, and
select around f2.8 to f4. This will not overpower the daylight, but will
give catch-lights in the eyes.
Rule 4. Look at the backgrounds. It is so easy to concentrate so hard on
the subject that you do not really “see” the background, which can be
confusing and cluttered. Try to keep the subject as far away as possible
from all backgrounds and if you have manual mode or aperture priority
mode, then set the aperture f stop at around f5.6.
Rule 5. Shoot in the early mornings or in the late afternoons. At both
of these times the light is more flattering than it is at mid-day, where
you will get harsh shadows cutting across the face from the nose.
Rule 6. If you have a zoom or a telephoto lens then now is the time!
Using around 135 mm, this is called by some people the ideal portrait
lens, then you again flatter the face and help throw the background out
of focus - particularly if you have followed Rule number 4.
Rule 7. Turn the camera on its side so you have the viewfinder in
portrait mode as well. People are taller than they are wide, so it makes
sense to have the maximum dimension vertically, doesn’t it! By all
means, take a couple of shots in the so called horizontal “landscape”
view, but the majority should be verticals.
Rule 8. The nose is not the central point of any portrait. In the centre
of the viewfinder there is generally a small area which you can use for
getting the focus point. After you have set the focus, move the central
point off the person’s nose! The more likely central point will be the
mouth or chin.
Rule 9. Super trick! Use a gold coloured reflector to give the skin that
healthy glow. Just glue some gold wrapping paper to a piece of cardboard
about 1 meter square and get an assistant to move it so it reflects
“golden glow” into the subject. This is particularly flattering for pale
skinned folk.
Rule 10. With older subjects stretch a piece of nylon stocking tightly
across the lens. This will act as a soft focus filter and smooth out
many of the wrinkles we like to pretend we haven’t got!
Follow those 10 simple rules and you will notice a marked difference in
your portraiture.
Modern Medicine:
by Dr. Iain Corness, Consultant
Dengue Fever - again and again and again!
At the time of writing this column, there are four westerners
in my hospital with Dengue Fever. These are not an isolated group that
caught it from drinking out of damp glasses in the same bar. Today’s daily
newspaper also had an item quoting 180 cases in Northern Thailand and 10
fatalities this year. That’s more than died from the SARS epidemic that had
people cringing in their homes afraid to go out without a gas mask.
So, despite my previous pleas (and those of the Public Health Department),
Dengue Fever and its potentially fatal variant, Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever
(DHF) is still with us. The latest figures have now prompted me to repeat my
advice on this subject. If you remember reading about it before, I
apologize, but the subject matter is very important. This is an important
ailment, that can be avoided.
However, first you should understand a little more about Dengue. It was
first described in 1780 by a Benjamin Rush in Philadelphia (so it didn’t
start here), when the name Break Bone Fever was applied, with the symptoms
of pain in the bones and rise in temperature. The name “Dengue” came in 1828
during an epidemic in Cuba. The new name was a Spanish attempt at a Swahili
phrase “ki denga pepo” which describes a sudden cramping seizure caused by
an evil spirit! Let me assure you that the local brand of Dengue Fever owes
nothing to spirits, evil, bottled or otherwise.
Like Malaria, the virus is carried by mosquitoes, this time by one called
Aedes aegypti. The virus itself is related to Japanese encephalitis, Murray
Valley encephalitis and Yellow fever, and there are four “serotypes” or
subgroups of it.
The mosquito lays its eggs in water containers, preferring the clean water
found in water tanks and pots, in the saucers under pot plants and even
under the pet’s food dish. Inside discarded car tyres is another favourite
spot. These mosquitoes are not of the adventurous type and feed during the
day and spend their time within 200 meters of their hatchery. Consequently,
the eradication of any local breeding areas becomes very important towards
maintaining your own health, as you can see. Keep your home free from lying
water for a radius of 200 metres and you’re looking good!
Simple Dengue (if you can call it that) has an incubation period of around
four to seven days and then the full blown symptoms of high fever and
headache begin. The headache is usually behind the eyes and is made worse by
eye movement. From there the pains progress to the limbs with acute muscle
pains, which gave it the old name “Break Bone Fever”. Interestingly, some
patients complain of a metallic taste in the mouth. (Please don’t ask - I
have no idea why!)
On the other hand, Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever can certainly be fatal! It
appears that Serotype 2 may be the culprit here, but does not usually
produce DHF unless you have been previously bitten by types 1, 3 or 4. In
addition to the symptoms of Classical Dengue the skin begins to bruise very
easily as the blood haemorrhages into the skin. Children are also more
susceptible to this than adults. This also becomes much more of an emergency
and is best treated in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of your favourite
hospital.
With our ability to treat the viral ailments being very limited, the defence
against the Dengue virus lies in the preventive measures. The other
precautions are to wear long trousers and long sleeved shirts, especially at
sun up and sun down, when the mosquito is at its most ravenous. The other
factor to remember is “D” for Dengue and “D” for DEET. DEET is the magic
ingredient in mosquito repellents, so when you go to buy some, check the
label - if it has DEET, then get it. And then remember to use it!
Heart to Heart with Hillary
Dear Hillary,
I am looking at buying a house in Thailand because the market is depressed
and should be a good time to buy. I have been married for some time now to
the same woman and will put the house in her name, as I don’t need the
hassle of lawyers and phony companies and all that, but my mates from my
favorite watering hole all say that I’m crazy. What is your feeling? We have
been married for seven years and have two kids plus one of hers from a
previous marriage. I read all the time about men who have been ripped off
here in Thailand.
House Hunter
Dear House Hunter,
It is very difficult for me to answer this, my Petal. From what you have
written, it does seem as though this is a strong bond, but people can
change, or hide their true feelings. This would be the same if you were
talking about buying a house in someone else’s name in the US or the UK, or
anywhere else for that matter. It is a measure of trust, and only you know
if you can put that trust to the test. I am aware that I get many writing in
complaining of being ripped off, losing houses, cars, gold and motorcycles,
but that does not mean that this happens all the time. You should also take
into consideration that it is only those who have been disadvantaged that
write in. Others happily living in marital harmony don’t need to write to an
Agony Aunt, do they. There are ways of safeguarding your investment, but you
need to talk to a lawyer, not me. Best of luck, House Hunter, and I hope you
will be one of the happy ones. You sound like a nice person. When you’re
ready for the second house, let me know and I’ll send up photocopy of my ID
card, so you can spell my name correctly!
Dear Hillary,
A lot of women in the local shopping center seem attracted to me. They sit
on the benches and call me over and want to talk with me, and some even
promise me Thai lessons in return for me giving English lessons to them.
Only thing is they all want me to take them somewhere for these lessons,
they’re not prepared to just sit on the bench and get them. “I go with you,”
is what most of them say. I am getting a bit leery of these requests, as I
don’t want to waste my hard earned cash, and it sounds all a little too
commercial for me. Do you think it’s my aftershave, or maybe my pheromones?
The linguist
Dear Linguist,
You are a cunning linguist, aren’t you, Petal! Making sure you keep the
cash! But perhaps your aftershave is clouding your vision, and the
pheromones unsettling the function of your brain. I doubt very much that
these are language students thirsting after knowledge, but rather they are
short-time students thirsting after money. A conclusion that you are slowly
coming round to, but it is certainly slowly. You can almost take it as 100
percent true, that ladies on shopping center benches are not there to spend
money - unless it’s yours! You should look for some real enthusiastic
amateurs to practice your linguistic skills.
Dear Hillary,
This a somewhat delicate problem, but you should understand more than most
about the relationships that men make when they are not living here, but are
only here for a few weeks at a time and then back to working in the sandbox.
I am a single man, and on my trips here I generally find that there will be
a young lady who will indicate that she would like to “I take care you”, and
a suitable arrangement can be agreed on. This is great for a bachelor like
me, but I also want to play the field a bit too. One young lady has really
begun to sink the hooks into me, and I can see a problem coming up, because
I own my own condo here. How do I get her to understand that this is not a
lifetime relationship, and when I go back to work I will want her to leave
the condo? I have four weeks left, Hillary, so a quick fix will be
appreciated.
Sam the Sandboy
Dear Sam the Sandboy,
You know what you have just proved, Petal? You can’t have your cake and eat
it too! The way around this problem is to bring it out into view and it will
cease to be such a worry for you. Since Hillary doesn’t know how good your
Thai is, it may be better for you to have an interpreter, as it is important
the young lady understands the situation. And understands it right now, not
two days before you leave. She has been taking care of you, so now you must
take a little care of her and her feelings. Now is the time to spell it all
out, my Petal. But do it gently, that’s a nice Sandboy.
Learn to Live to Learn: with Andrew Watson
Eating you up inside
Ever done anything bad? Ever done anything wrong?
Ever done anything you regret? Ever cheated or lied? Ever spread
falsehood? Ever stolen something? Of course you have! The
fragile reality of humanity: fallibility.
The question is not whether we have or not, it’s what have we
done to make amends? The capacity to demonstrate remorse, the
ability to apologise, to genuinely acknowledge that we have made
a mistake, requires strength of character, humility and
integrity. And great beauty.
I don’t think you have to be a Christian to understand what
forgiveness can and does mean, but perhaps it helps. Followers
of Jesus Christ or the Buddha will tell you of the sense of
wonder which accompanies true forgiveness, where desire is left
behind. It is a wondrous, magical thing indeed. Take hatred for
example - an evil word, an evil thought, the embodiment of
darkness. Mandela, incarcerated for thirty years on account of
colour showed how to defeat hatred by astounding personal
example. At the root of his success was the simple
understanding; that it is not only the oppressed who needed to
be liberated, but also the oppressor. The oppressor also needs
to be freed - from ignorance, prejudice, greed and hatred - the
unforgiving guardians of misery.
But what happens to those who choose not to embark on the
glorious road to spiritual liberation and instead choose to
harbour evil in their hearts and stoke the fires of mischief
with lies and malevolent intent? Aberrant thoughts besiege them,
whilst self-delusion (the worst kind of delusion) reinforces
ill-begotten prejudice and ignorance seeps like pus from septic
minds.
But nature is a remarkable phenomenon indeed. The heart knows
what the mind does and cannot be fooled. Metaphorically, every
evil thought drops like a pollutant and infiltrates the flesh,
which decays in natural rebellion against the imposition of
filth. “You are what you eat,” after all. Alternatively, “You
are what you drink” and as they used to say in the pubs, “And
he’s a bitter man”. Over in this part of the world, I think they
call it “Karma”.
Nature has a rather wonderful way of cleansing itself - time is
nature’s healer - but the pathways of history are littered with
the remnants of people who were determined to contest this
eternal truth. All the “good books” tell you the same. Yet it’s
extraordinary the lengths people will go to, nay the distances
people will travel, to intentionally do harm to another, whether
it’s in the shape of a B52 or other bulbous belligerence.
As a mentor of mine recently wrote, “Someone does mean, petty
things invariably damages only one person - themselves.” His
sage counsel continued, “In my experience keeping above the fray
usually works and the other person just makes a fool of
themselves.” Which kind of infers that we should leave it all to
nature, or to God. It might sometimes be tempting to give God a
helping hand of course, but this is a dangerous path indeed, for
then we might claim that “God is on our side” and we know where
that can lead. Ghandi had it about right, I reckon, when he
spoke of the eternal battle of good against evil. Reassuringly,
he noted that whilst tyrants might sometimes seem to have the
upper hand and social justice seems a distant dream, the way of
righteousness and justice in the end, has always prevailed.
There is a man I know, thoughtful and intelligent, gentle and
kind, who has every reason to take umbrage with persistent
falsehood spoken about him. When I asked him recently why he
chooses not to defend himself, he thought deeply and then said
two things. First, he would be demeaning himself by responding
to slurs and dragging himself down to the level of the sewer.
Second, he spoke of compassion and forgiveness for his assailant
and his deep devotion to the lessons of his spiritual teaching
(the persuasion of his spiritual belief in this sense, is not
relevant) which requires that his ‘cup runneth over’. By which
he means, of course, that you should ‘love your enemy’. This man
leaves it all to God, and God, frankly, seems to ‘do the
business’.
Of course it’s difficult to sit back and do nothing sometimes.
Some cultures aren’t really the kind to ‘turn the other cheek’.
It’s still ‘eye for an eye’ Old Testament stuff, making as
Ghandi observed, ‘the whole world blind’. It requires something
special indeed to break the cycle of violence, especially when
determined myopics seem so keen to pour petrol on the flames.
Jim Collins, author of ‘Good to Great’ talks of people ‘looking
out of the window’ to blame others, rather than ‘looking in the
mirror’ and taking responsibility for their own thoughts, words
and deeds.
In school, I try and encourage “The Three R’s”; Respect for
yourself, Respect for others and Responsibilities for your
actions. A potentially empty platitude of course, unless
reinforced and modelled in everyday life. The idea of taking
responsibility is especially important. Look at politics; there
was a time when a politician with integrity would resign when
something went seriously wrong in their department, or they
found themselves in either ethical or moral turmoil over the
position of their government (Clare Short in the UK over the
Iraq war comes to mind). But now? They seem to prefer to blame
someone else, addressing the symptoms of the disease rather than
the tumour itself, usually for the sake of self-preservation.
Their careers, after all, (they seem to believe) are far more
important to them than for instance, the “welfare of the child,”
whether in Iraq or anywhere else. A morally unsustainable
position of course, but one which readers must recognise from
their own experiences of work and play. Yet who amongst us can
truly say that we “question the spin” on the basis that what we
see, hear or read, may not be true. Because at the end of a long
week at work, sometimes, it’s just too much effort to do so. But
before leaving it to God, we should perhaps beware of repeating
the mistakes of history.
Andrew Watson is a Management Consultant for Garden
International Schools in Thailand. [email protected]
All proceeds from this column are donated to the Esther
Benjamins Trust. www.ebtrust.org.uk email: [email protected]
Next week: How far would you have gone?
|