Tax
“All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine,
education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and
public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?”
The famous outburst by Reg, leader of The Peoples’ Front of
Judea, in Monty Python’s The Life of Brian could equally have been a
comment on Roman occupation of Britain, except that it misses one other
significant Roman import - taxation. The first taxes assessed and collected in
Britain were during the Roman occupation. Understandably this innovation wasn’t
too popular with taxpayers and although there may have been no Reg or Peoples’
Front of Judea, the queen of East Anglia, Boadicea, led a revolt against corrupt
tax collectors, which before it was crushed by Emperor Nero, resulted in 80,000
deaths, including all Roman soldiers within 100 miles and the capture of London.
Roman rule may have ended in the fifth century but the legacy
of taxation is something that has remained with us ever since.
Significant dates in the
development of the UK taxation system
55 BC - The first Roman campaigns against Britain, leading to
Roman occupation and the introduction of taxation
60 AD - Boadicea’s revolt
4th century onwards - Saxon power grew as Rome’s influence
waned. Saxon Kings levied taxes on land and property as well as substantial
customs duties.
991 - The first documented instance of taxes being levied to
be paid in tribute to Viking raiders to save England from being ravaged. Later
referred to as Danegeld, over 100 tonnes of silver was ultimately paid as
tributes.
1050 - Lady Godiva’s legendary naked ride through the streets
of Coventry in response to a promise from her husband, Leofric, Earl of Mercia,
to reduce the high taxes he levied on the local residents in return.
1369 - After a lull, the Hundred Years War resumed as the
nobles of Aquitaine rejected oppressive tax policies of Edward, The Black
Prince.
1377 - Polls show that taxes had now clearly become
progressive, with the Duke of Lancaster paying 520 times the amount of tax
typically paid by members of the peasantry.
1487 - John Morton, Lord Chancellor, devised the ingenious
approach to tax collection subsequently known as Morton’s Fork.*
1649 - The execution of Charles I. His problems with
Parliament stemmed from a disagreement in 1629 about the respective taxation
rights of the King and the Parliament. In the intervening years, Parliament had
imposed excise taxes on essential commodities and foodstuffs in order to pay for
the army commanded by Oliver Cromwell.
1800 - An annual emergency income tax was introduced to help
fund the Napoleonic Wars.
1816 - Income tax was repealed but this was to be a temporary
respite. Contemporary opponents of the tax had wanted all records of it
destroyed to prevent its subsequent re-introduction. Consequently, the documents
pertaining to income tax were indeed publicly burned by the Chancellor of the
Exchequer. However, copies were retained in the parliamentary basements.
Technically income tax is still a temporary tax and even today is only ever
imposed by parliament one year at a time.
Morton’s Fork
Henry VII became King of England and Lord of Ireland at the
Battle of Bosworth Field on August 22, 1485 through the defeat of Richard III.
He inherited a much divided country following the political upheavals of the
Wars of the Roses. He is generally credited with restoring political and
financial stability through highly successful wide-ranging administrative,
economic and diplomatic policies. One of his first significant appointments was
making John Morton first the Archbishop of Canterbury in 1486 and then the Lord
Chancellor the following year. In this latter role, Morton was primarily tasked
with restoring the royal purse, which had been heavily depleted during previous
reigns. Morton appointed Edmund Dudley and Richard Empson as tax collectors and
using the policy that became known as Morton’s Fork successfully replenished the
royal estate. Morton’s basic approach was that a taxpayer who lived an
extravagant life could clearly afford such expenditure and therefore had ample
surplus income and could afford to pay a high tax bill. However, a taxpayer who
was more frugal clearly had low outgoings and therefore must have substantial
savings and could therefore afford to pay a high tax bill. Or as John Morton
himself said: “If the subject is seen to live frugally, tell him because he is
clearly a money saver of great ability, he can afford to give generously to the
King. If, however, the subject lives a life of great extravagance, tell him he,
too, can afford to give largely, the proof of his opulence being evident in his
expenditure.”
Or, to put it another way, you are shafted now matter what
you do!
Britain’s rich history of taxation is reflected in today’s
taxation practices and legislation. For example, the Trust was introduced as a
device for the protection of goods and chattels of departing Knights in the
times of The Crusades but remains an essential part of tax-planning today for
most UK expats and virtually all who have assets in excess of the Inheritance
Tax threshold of ฃ325,000. Company cars in the UK were taxed as a benefit using
a 19th century tax code that was originally introduced in respect of horses.
More significantly for many expatriates, issues such as
domicile, which have a very long precedence in UK law, are currently under the
microscope in a modern world where labour and capital are able to move much more
freely than in the past. As a result, the UK Taxes Acts and their
interpretations for expatriates are currently changing faster than at any
previous time. The implications of the high profile taxation judgements in the
cases affecting expatriates such as Robert Gaines-Cooper and Lyle Dicker Grace
are that sweeping changes that have already taken place in the bases of UK
taxation of expatriates are most likely only the thin end of a very thick wedge.
A timely review of taxation arrangements and potential
liabilities with a UK expatriate tax expert is essential. This is one of those
very rare situations where there genuinely is now a limited window of
opportunity to act. Of course, if you do not plan now and you find yourself
facing higher UK tax liabilities than you would have envisaged as an expatriate,
you could always offer to ride naked around the streets of Coventry but we doubt
that is likely to reduce any tax liabilities that you may face in the 21st
century.
The above data and research was compiled from sources
believed to be reliable. However, neither MBMG International Ltd nor its
officers can accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the above
article nor bear any responsibility for any losses achieved as a result of any
actions taken or not taken as a consequence of reading the above article. For
more information please contact Graham Macdonald on [email protected]
|
|