In the interests of saving the shareholders money, many
years ago British Leyland grouped many of their brands together under the
same roof. Then they found they could save even more money by retrenching
the “extra” designers they had left over. After all, why did Riley
need a designer, when there were Morris and Austin ones? For that matter,
what about MG? This brought on the infamous “badge engineering” that
saw Mini variants with different grilles being sold as Morrises or Austins
or Rileys (though from memory, the Riley got some vestigial tail fins, so
help me)! The end result was the downfall of Riley and eventually the
whole conglomerate fell over.
The latest on the British automotive front is the
proposed merger of three marques owned by Ford Motor Company, and right
now, FoMoCo are hurting, revamping and regrouping. As part of that,
Jaguar, Land Rover and Aston Martin are to be brought into a single
business unit within Ford’s Premier Automotive Group in a move causing
concern in some quarters over the potential for losing their brand
identity.
Aston
Martin
According to Automotive News, an “operating
committee” of Premier Automotive Group executives established on October
31 will be reconstituted as a formal board of directors this week.
Executive reassignments under the new British-brand corporate structure
will be made in December.
Again, the same “logic” as British Leyland is being
touted. Putting the three brands under one corporate structure could
create savings by eliminating personnel and administrative overlaps. The
three marques already have combined their operations in North America and
Japan, with many executives having control over disciplines for all three
brands.
Now this may sound logical, but is it? North America
and Japan do not make Jaguars, Land Rovers or Aston Martins - they only
sell and service them. That’s a very different situation from designing
and building them.
The source at Automotive News did note that a group
insider who insisted on anonymity said he was worried that the three
British brands have little in common, negating any argument for combining
them. Aston Martin is a boutique maker of performance sports cars; Land
Rover is a premium sport-utility maker; and Jaguar, a luxury-heritage
brand. The concept that badge engineering could happen with these three is
not a pleasant thought. Will Jaguar engined Land Rovers be the thin end of
the wedge?
New
Land Rover F1
Actually no, the thin end is the location. The three
will combine their engineering operations at Land Rover’s headquarters
in Gaydon, England. The automakers’ design teams will work from the same
styling studio in London. This is certainly back to the future.
Was this the last straw for former managing director
Jonathan Browning who suddenly resigned from the group in October?
Industry sources believe the resignation was triggered by his opposition
to the new structure and his concern that it would undermine the carefully
nurtured Jaguar brand.
Browning’s replacement, Mike Beasley, has far less
authority than did Browning, raising concerns that he will not be able to
protect Jaguar from board decisions. Adding to that fear is the elevation
of Land Rover’s chairman to become a Ford vice president, incorporating
the presidency of Jaguar and, it is rumoured, presidency of Aston Martin
as well.
Karl Ludvigsen, an industry analyst based in London who
specializes in Ford says, “What we are seeing are key steps leading to a
structure other than the one they have with Premier Automotive Group. The
building blocks are being put in place. I am not able to think of any
reason why it wouldn’t make terrific sense making PAG a single business
unit with three brands.” I’m sorry, Karl, the British Leyland disaster
is enough of a reason for me!
Last week I asked you to take a look at the picture
shown again now. This car was launched in at the 1984 Turin Motor Show. It
featured a magnesium cased Hewland transaxle and something else about its
transmission to make it a very notable road car for the Ford Motor
Company. What is the car and what was so notable from FoMoCo’s point of
view about the transmission?
This
was the very special Ford RS 200, the rally car which was beaten by the
demise of the Group B regulations, not by anything else. In rally form the
turbocharged BDA derived engine could churn out 450 bhp, but the
“cooking” model for road use still had 250 neddies under the foot in a
1000 kg motor car. It is important in Ford history as it was their first
4WD road car.
So this week, and perhaps a little known fact for some
race fans. The concept of qualifying to get the grid position was not
always the case. The drivers used to draw for positions and that was it.
However, (and here’s a huge clue) in 1933 the first Grand Prix to be
started from grid positions determined by the times in practice was held.
What was that first Grand Prix?
For the Automania FREE beer this week, be the first
correct answer to fax 427 596 or email [email protected]