![](../images/PMPortal-5-copy_07.jpg) |
|
![](../images/PMPortal-5-copy_23.jpg) |
Snap Shots: by Harry Flashman
|
|
The Travel Bug
In
around three months, many of you will be gearing up for the overseas trip to see
relatives “back home”. In around four months many of you will then be showing
your travel shots from ‘over there’ to friends ‘over here’, and will be very
disappointed with the results.
Let’s see if we can get you over some common hurdles and improve this situation.
The first thing to remember is that travel shots are not all portraits. Sure,
everyone wants to see how granddad looks these days, so be prepared to take some
dedicated portrait shots of him. Do not try and incorporate granddad, grandma
and the three cousins standing outside the village fountain while eating ice
creams. It won’t make a good travel shot and neither will it make for good
portraits.
With digital cameras, now you can see if you’ve got it in one second. All you
have to do is look critically at your images! If you haven’t got the shot you
wanted, you are still there and can take it again. For that reason alone, you
should take a digital camera with you on holidays.
However, there are many other good reasons, including the fact that the memory
chip is not affected by the airport security scanners. You can take two or three
memory cards with you without using up space in handbags. And photoshops all
over the world can read the cards very easily and burn you a CD instantly.
However, to come back with some cracker holiday shots is not all that difficult,
it just needs some thought and time. Not taking the correct amount of time in
shooting is probably the number one reason for getting disappointing results.
The corollary is that by taking time, you will get better results!
Take a look at the shot this week of the Cambodian girl on the bicycle. This was
taken by a keen amateur, the late Ernie Kuehnelt, and took one hour. No, he did
not get the girl to cycle back and forth for 60 minutes, but he stayed in
position (in the shade) close to a bridge in Siem Reap for one hour. During that
time he snapped interesting looking subjects and this shot was one of the best.
It is a wonderfully evocative shot that shows the lifestyle of a Cambodian
peasant girl. By the way, the shot was taken using the follow focus facility,
and it certainly worked well.
What is worth noting from Ernie Kuehnelt’s photograph is that he came back with
images of Cambodia, not photographs of “me beside a temple” or “me taken with
our guide”. Your camera should be used to record the places you visited, not
just you on your holidays. The former kinds of photographs are interesting. The
latter are not, other than to your mother!
Before your trip, you should also have some ideas on the subject matter. This
you can get from the internet or your friendly travel agent, but if you are
going to Koln, for example, you have to put some time aside for the cathedral
and the river transport there. Or if you are going to Canada, try to make sure
you get a moose. Or if going to the US, look for Mickey Mouse.
What camera should you take? Well, unless you are hoping to send the photographs
to National Geographic, I would probably suggest you leave the expensive digital
SLR at home. Why? Because lugging an expensive camera around tourist spots can
be a chore, as well as worrying about its welfare. Ever tried to fit one camera
and lenses, into a hotel security box? A point and shoot compact with a
mini-zoom would be my choice, and a large capacity memory card. With the price
of these going down all the time, look at seeing if you can take a couple of 2GB
cards with you.
Finally, think about how you are going to present the results. It is always a
huge temptation to rush in as you get back. Wait! Sort them, keep the good ones,
delete the bad. Put your best shots on CD and think about an on-line site that
will host your shots for the world to access.
|
|
![](../me-top.gif) |
|
|
![](../images/PMPortal-5-copy_18.jpg) |
|
![](../images/PMPortal-5-copy_07.jpg) |